% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hemminki:292073,
author = {K. Hemminki$^*$ and F. Zitricky and A. Försti$^*$ and O.
Hemminki and V. Liska and A. Hemminki},
title = {{S}urvival improvements in esophageal and gastric cancers
in the {N}ordic countries favor younger patients.},
journal = {Cancer medicine},
volume = {13},
number = {15},
issn = {2045-7634},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01581},
pages = {e7365},
year = {2024},
note = {#EA:Z999#},
abstract = {Esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) are fatal
cancers with a relatively late age of onset. Age is a
negative risk factor for survival in many cancers and our
aim was to analyze age-specific survival in EC and GC using
the recently updated NORDCAN database. NORDCAN data
originate from the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish
nationwide cancer registries covering years 1972 through
2021 inviting for comparison of 50-year survival trends
between the countries. Relative 1- and 5-year survival and
5/1-year conditional survival (i.e., survival in those who
were alive in Year 1 to survive additional 4 years) were
analyzed. Survival in EC showed large gains for patients
below age 80 years, 5-year survival in Norwegian men
reaching $30\%$ and in women over $30\%$ but for 80-89 year
old survival remained at $10\%.$ In contrast, hardly any
gain was seen among the 80-89 year patients for 1-year
survival and small gains in 5 year and 5/1-year survival.
Survival gaps between age-groups increased over time. For GC
there was also a clear age-related negative survival
gradient but the survival gaps between the age groups did
not widen over time; Norwegian male and female 5-year
survival for 80-89 year old was about $20\%.$ The
age-specific survival difference in GC arose in Year 1 and
did not essentially increase in 5-year survival. While there
were differences in survival improvements between the
countries, poor survival of the 80-89 year old patients was
shared by all of them. To conclude, survival has improved
steadily in younger GC and EC patients in most Nordic
countries. While the 80-89 year old population accounts for
nearly a quarter of all patients and their poor survival
depressed overall survival, which can therefore be increased
further by improving diagnostics, treatment and care of
elderly EC and GC patients.},
keywords = {Humans / Esophageal Neoplasms: mortality / Esophageal
Neoplasms: epidemiology / Stomach Neoplasms: mortality /
Stomach Neoplasms: epidemiology / Male / Female / Aged, 80
and over / Aged / Middle Aged / Age Factors / Registries /
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries: epidemiology / Adult /
Survival Rate / mortality (Other) / relative survival
(Other) / risk factors (Other) / stomach cancer (Other) /
treatment (Other)},
cin = {Z999 / B062 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)Z999-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)B062-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39096090},
pmc = {pmc:PMC11297530},
doi = {10.1002/cam4.7365},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/292073},
}