000292332 001__ 292332
000292332 005__ 20241218141909.0
000292332 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10728-024-00488-w
000292332 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:39158650
000292332 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1065-3058
000292332 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-3394
000292332 037__ $$aDKFZ-2024-01683
000292332 041__ $$aEnglish
000292332 082__ $$a610
000292332 1001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0$$aUbels, Jasper$$b0$$eFirst author$$udkfz
000292332 245__ $$aThe Use of a Comprehensive Concept of Capability for Wellbeing Assessment: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.
000292332 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2024
000292332 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000292332 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000292332 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1724152602_18972
000292332 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000292332 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000292332 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000292332 500__ $$a#EA:C100#LA:C100# / epub
000292332 520__ $$aDeveloping an instrument with the capability approach can be challenging, since the capability concept of Sen is ambiguous concerning the burdens that people experience whilst achieving their capabilities. A solution is to develop instruments with a comprehensive concept of capability, such as the concept of 'option-freedom'. This study aims to develop a theoretical framework for instrument development with the concept of option-freedom. A best-fit framework synthesis was conducted with seven qualitative papers by one researcher. Two researchers supported the synthesis by discussing interim results during the synthesis. A priori concepts of option-freedom were used to deductively code against. Themes and subthemes were developed inductively when data did not match a priori themes. Seven paper were identified that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four themes emerged from the synthesis. (1) Option Wellbeing represents a range of options that need to be satisfied for individuals to experience wellbeing. (2) Self-Realization represents that there are experiences in an individual's life that have value beyond realizing options. (3) Perceived Access to Options represents the perceived ability of individuals to realize freedoms. (4) Perceived Control represents the experience of having control. Developing an instrument with the proposed framework has two benefits. First, it acknowledges the importance of assessing impediments in realizing capabilities for wellbeing assessment. Secondly, the themes form a broad informational base by including themes related to subjective wellbeing. Future research should study the feasibility of implementing the framework for instrument development.
000292332 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313$$a313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)$$cPOF4-313$$fPOF IV$$x0
000292332 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aBest-fit framework synthesis
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aCapability approach
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aHealth economics
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aOutcome measurement
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aPatient-reported outcomes
000292332 650_7 $$2Other$$aQuality of life
000292332 7001_ $$00000-0003-1353-9788$$aHernandez-Villafuerte, Karla$$b1
000292332 7001_ $$00000-0001-5254-6759$$aNiebauer, Erica$$b2
000292332 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf$$aSchlander, Michael$$b3$$eLast author$$udkfz
000292332 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2005104-9$$a10.1007/s10728-024-00488-w$$pnn$$tHealth care analysis$$vnn$$x1065-3058$$y2024
000292332 8564_ $$uhttps://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/292332/files/s10728-024-00488-w.pdf
000292332 8564_ $$uhttps://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/292332/files/s10728-024-00488-w.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000292332 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:292332$$pVDB
000292332 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b0$$kDKFZ
000292332 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$60000-0003-1353-9788$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000292332 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b3$$kDKFZ
000292332 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vKrebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention$$x0
000292332 9141_ $$y2024
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2023-08-28$$wger
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2023-08-28$$wger
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2023-08-28$$wger
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bHEALTH CARE ANAL : 2022$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2023-08-28
000292332 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-08-28
000292332 9202_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331$$kC100$$lGesundheitsökonomie$$x0
000292332 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331$$kC100$$lGesundheitsökonomie$$x0
000292332 9200_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331$$kC100$$lGesundheitsökonomie$$x0
000292332 980__ $$ajournal
000292332 980__ $$aVDB
000292332 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
000292332 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED