Home > Publications database > The Use of a Comprehensive Concept of Capability for Wellbeing Assessment: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis. > print

001     292332
005     20241218141909.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s10728-024-00488-w
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:39158650
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1065-3058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1573-3394
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2024-01683
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Ubels, Jasper
|0 P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a The Use of a Comprehensive Concept of Capability for Wellbeing Assessment: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|c 2024
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1724152602_18972
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:C100#LA:C100# / epub
520 _ _ |a Developing an instrument with the capability approach can be challenging, since the capability concept of Sen is ambiguous concerning the burdens that people experience whilst achieving their capabilities. A solution is to develop instruments with a comprehensive concept of capability, such as the concept of 'option-freedom'. This study aims to develop a theoretical framework for instrument development with the concept of option-freedom. A best-fit framework synthesis was conducted with seven qualitative papers by one researcher. Two researchers supported the synthesis by discussing interim results during the synthesis. A priori concepts of option-freedom were used to deductively code against. Themes and subthemes were developed inductively when data did not match a priori themes. Seven paper were identified that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four themes emerged from the synthesis. (1) Option Wellbeing represents a range of options that need to be satisfied for individuals to experience wellbeing. (2) Self-Realization represents that there are experiences in an individual's life that have value beyond realizing options. (3) Perceived Access to Options represents the perceived ability of individuals to realize freedoms. (4) Perceived Control represents the experience of having control. Developing an instrument with the proposed framework has two benefits. First, it acknowledges the importance of assessing impediments in realizing capabilities for wellbeing assessment. Secondly, the themes form a broad informational base by including themes related to subjective wellbeing. Future research should study the feasibility of implementing the framework for instrument development.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Best-fit framework synthesis
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Capability approach
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Health economics
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Outcome measurement
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Patient-reported outcomes
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Quality of life
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Hernandez-Villafuerte, Karla
|0 0000-0003-1353-9788
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Niebauer, Erica
|0 0000-0001-5254-6759
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Schlander, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf
|b 3
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s10728-024-00488-w
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2005104-9
|p nn
|t Health care analysis
|v nn
|y 2024
|x 1065-3058
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/292332/files/s10728-024-00488-w.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/292332/files/s10728-024-00488-w.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:292332
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 0000-0003-1353-9788
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b HEALTH CARE ANAL : 2022
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2023-08-28
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-28
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
|k C100
|l Gesundheitsökonomie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
|k C100
|l Gesundheitsökonomie
|x 0
920 0 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
|k C100
|l Gesundheitsökonomie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21