000293339 001__ 293339
000293339 005__ 20241104094135.0
000293339 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/mp.17376
000293339 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:39292615
000293339 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0094-2405
000293339 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1522-8541
000293339 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2473-4209
000293339 037__ $$aDKFZ-2024-01887
000293339 041__ $$aEnglish
000293339 082__ $$a610
000293339 1001_ $$aFaust, Jonas Frederik$$b0
000293339 245__ $$aRapid CNN-based needle localization for automatic slice alignment in MR-guided interventions using 3D undersampled radial white-marker imaging.
000293339 260__ $$aCollege Park, Md.$$bAAPM$$c2024
000293339 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000293339 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000293339 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1730709658_15901
000293339 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000293339 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000293339 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000293339 500__ $$a2024 Nov;51(11):8018-8033
000293339 520__ $$aIn MR-guided in-bore percutaneous needle interventions, typically 2D interactive real-time imaging is used for navigating the needle into the target. Misaligned 2D imaging planes can result in losing visibility of the needle in the 2D images, which impedes successful targeting. Necessary iterative manual slice adjustment can prolong interventional workflows. Therefore, rapid automatic alignment of the imaging planes with the needle would be preferable to improve such workflows.To investigate rapid 3D localization of needles in MR-guided interventions via a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based localization algorithm using an undersampled white-marker contrast acquisition for the purpose of automatic imaging slice alignment.A radial 3D rf-spoiled gradient echo MR pulse sequence with white-marker encoding was implemented and a CNN-based localization algorithm was employed to extract position and orientation of an aspiration needle from the undersampled white-marker images. The CNN was trained using porcine tissue phantoms (257 needle trajectories, four-fold data augmentation, 90%/10% split into training and validation dataset). Achievable localization times and accuracy were evaluated retrospectively in an ex vivo study (109 needle trajectories) for a range of needle orientations between 78° and 90° relative to the B0 field. A proof-of-concept in vivo experiment was performed in two porcine animal models and feasibility of automatic imaging slice alignment was evaluated retrospectively.Ex vivo needle localization was achieved with a median localization accuracy of 1.9 mm (distance needle tip to detected needle axis) and a median angular deviation of 2.6° for needle orientations between 86° and 90° to the B0 field from fully sampled WM images (resolution of (4 mm)3, 6434 acquired radial k-space spokes, acquisition time of 80.4 s) in a field-of-view of (256 mm)3. Localization accuracy decreased with increasing undersampling and needle trajectory increasingly aligned with B0. For needle orientations between 86° and 90° to the B0 field, a highly accelerated acquisition of only 32 k-space spokes (acquisition time of 0.4 s) yielded a median localization accuracy of 3.1 mm and a median angular deviation of 4.7°. For needle orientations between 78° and 82° to the B0 field, a median accuracy and angular deviation of 3.5 mm and 6.8° could still be achieved with 64 sampled spokes (acquisition time of 0.8 s). In vivo, a localization accuracy of 1.4 mm and angular deviation of 3.4° was achieved sampling 32 k-space spokes (acquisition time of 0.48 s) with the needle oriented at 87.7° to the B0 field. For a needle oriented at 77.6° to the B0 field, localization accuracy of 5.3 mm and angular deviation of 6.8° were still achieved sampling 128 k-space spokes (acquisition time of 1.92 s), allowing for retrospective slice alignment.The investigated approach enables passive biopsy needle localization in 3D. Acceleration of the localization to real-time applicability is feasible for needle orientations approximately perpendicular to B0. The method can potentially facilitate MR-guided needle interventions by enabling automatic imaging slice alignment with the needle.
000293339 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000293339 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000293339 650_7 $$2Other$$adevice localization
000293339 650_7 $$2Other$$ainterventional MRI
000293339 650_7 $$2Other$$apercutaneous needle intervention
000293339 7001_ $$aKrafft, Axel Joachim$$b1
000293339 7001_ $$aPolak, Daniel$$b2
000293339 7001_ $$aSpeier, Peter$$b3
000293339 7001_ $$aBehl, Nicolas Gerhard Roland$$b4
000293339 7001_ $$aOoms, Nathan$$b5
000293339 7001_ $$aRoll, Jesse$$b6
000293339 7001_ $$aKrieger, Joshua$$b7
000293339 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8$$aLadd, Mark Edward$$b8$$udkfz
000293339 7001_ $$aMaier, Florian$$b9
000293339 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1466421-5$$a10.1002/mp.17376$$gp. mp.17376$$n11$$p8018-8033$$tMedical physics$$v51$$x0094-2405$$y2024
000293339 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:293339$$pVDB
000293339 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b8$$kDKFZ
000293339 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000293339 9141_ $$y2024
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2023-10-21$$wger
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMED PHYS : 2022$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2023-10-21
000293339 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-10-21
000293339 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lE020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000293339 980__ $$ajournal
000293339 980__ $$aVDB
000293339 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000293339 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED