% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dontas:293588,
      author       = {I. A. Dontas and D. J. Fry and D. I. Lewis and K. Applebee
                      and M. Fentener van Vlissingen and K. Marinou and J.
                      Schenkel$^*$},
      title        = {{G}uidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those
                      designing procedures and projects - {R}eport of an {ETPLAS}
                      {W}orking {G}roup.},
      journal      = {Laboratory animals},
      volume       = {58},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {0023-6772},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {Sage},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2024-01911},
      pages        = {626-639},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {W430, Gruppe Schenkel / 2024 Dec;58(6):626-639 / #LA:W410#},
      abstract     = {This document provides assessment criteria for evaluation
                      of each of the Learning Outcomes of the Modules specified
                      (in addition to the Core Modules) for those designing
                      procedures and projects in the Education and Training
                      Framework guidance document by the European Commission and
                      endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. This
                      Working Group was tasked to produce these criteria by the
                      Education $\&$ Training Platform for Laboratory Animal
                      Science, which was funded by the European Commission to this
                      aim. The assessment criteria address knowledge and skills
                      (including critical thinking) expected to be acquired during
                      education and training of persons preparing to design
                      research procedures and projects using animals under the
                      scope of Directive 2010/63/EU. Recognizing the diversity of
                      expertise and experiences of those being educated and
                      trained, we provide two levels of attainment, an ideal
                      response and one that would be acceptable for each Learning
                      Outcome. The balance between ideal and acceptable could be
                      decided by the particular course providers and/or assessors,
                      according to their local requirements. We envisage that the
                      use of these assessment criteria by training providers and
                      accrediting or approving bodies will help harmonize the
                      education and training for those who will design procedures
                      and projects using animals for scientific purposes. In
                      Europe, this may also contribute to mutual recognition of
                      training, and facilitate free movement of scientists.},
      keywords     = {Assessment criteria (Other) / Directive 2010/63/EU (Other)
                      / education and training (Other) / experimental design
                      (Other) / learning outcomes (Other) / procedures (Other) /
                      projects (Other)},
      cin          = {W410},
      ddc          = {590},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)W410-20160331},
      pnm          = {311 - Zellbiologie und Tumorbiologie (POF4-311)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-311},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:39308215},
      doi          = {DOI:10.1177/00236772241244527},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/293588},
}