% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ladd:293947,
      author       = {M. Ladd$^*$ and H. H. Quick and K. Scheffler and O. Speck},
      title        = {{D}esign requirements for human {UHF} magnets from the
                      perspective of {MRI} scientists},
      journal      = {Superconductor science and technology},
      volume       = {37},
      number       = {11},
      issn         = {0953-2048},
      address      = {Bristol},
      publisher    = {IOP Publ.},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2024-02013},
      pages        = {113001},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {#EA:E020#},
      abstract     = {The highest magnetic field strength for human-sized
                      magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)currently lies at 11.7
                      tesla. Given the opportunities for enhanced sensitivity and
                      improved dataquality at higher static magnetic fields,
                      several initiatives around the world are pursuing
                      theimplementation of further human MRI systems at or above
                      11.7 tesla. In general, members ofthe magnetic resonance
                      (MR) research community are not experts on magnet
                      technology.However, the magnet is the technological heart of
                      any MR system, and the MRI community ischallenging the
                      magnet research and design community to fulfill the current
                      engineering gap inimplementing large-bore, highly
                      homogeneous and stabile magnets at field strengths that
                      gobeyond the performance capability of niobium–titanium.
                      In this article, we present an overviewof magnet design for
                      such systems from the perspective of MR scientists. The
                      underlyingmotivation and need for higher magnetic fields are
                      briefly introduced, and system designconsiderations for the
                      magnet as well as for the MRI subsystems such as the
                      gradients, theshimming arrangement, and the radiofrequency
                      hardware are presented. Finally, importantlimitations to
                      higher magnetic fields from physiological considerations are
                      described, operatingunder the assumption that any
                      engineering or economic barriers to realizing such systems
                      willbe overcome.},
      subtyp        = {Review Article},
      cin          = {E020},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331},
      pnm          = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1088/1361-6668/ad7d3f},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/293947},
}