% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sitarz:294077,
author = {M. Sitarz and M. G. Ronga and F. Gesualdi and A. Bonfrate
and N. Wahl$^*$ and L. De Marzi},
title = {{I}mplementation and validation of a very-high-energy
electron model in the mat{R}ad treatment planning system.},
journal = {Medical physics},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
issn = {0094-2405},
address = {College Park, Md.},
publisher = {AAPM},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-02098},
pages = {518-529},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Jan;52(1):518-529},
abstract = {While electron beams of up to 20 MeV are commonly used in
radiotherapy, the use of very-high-energy electrons (VHEEs)
in the range of 100-200 MeV is now becoming a realistic
option thanks to the recent advancements in accelerator
technology. Indeed, VHEE offers several clinically
attractive features and can be delivered using various
conformation methods (including scanning, collimation, and
focussing) at ultra-high dose rates. To date, there is a
lack of research tools for fast simulation of treatment
plans using VHEE beams.This work aims to implement and
validate a simple and fast dose calculation algorithm based
on the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple Coulomb scattering for
VHEE radiation therapy, with energies up to 200 MeV. A
treatment planning system (TPS) toolkit with VHEE modality
would indeed allow for further preclinical investigations,
including treatment plan optimization and evaluation, and
thus contribute to the gradual introduction of VHEE
radiotherapy in clinical practice.A VHEE pencil beam
scanning double Gaussian model was introduced into the
open-source TPS matRad environment along with new functions
and options dedicated to VHEE dose calculations. Various
geometries and field configurations were then calculated in
matRad (up to 200 MeV and 15 × 15 cm2, with complex bone or
lung heterogeneities) and the results were compared to Monte
Carlo simulations in the TOPAS/Geant4 toolkit. Two types of
beam model (divergent or focused) were also tested. Examples
of clinical treatment plans were computed, and the results
were compared between the two codes.VHEE modality was fully
implemented in matRad with GUI capabilities while preserving
all original TPS features. New relevant options such as the
importation of specific spot-lists or adjustment of the
lateral dose calculation cutoff to optimize the calculation
speed were validated. Single spot and square field dose
distributions were validated in water alone as well as in
clinically relevant inhomogeneities. Dose maps from the VHEE
model in matRad were in good agreement with TOPAS (2D gamma
index $[2\%/1$ mm] with passing rates superior to $90\%,$
$<6\%$ mean dose differences), except for large interface
heterogeneities.This work describes the implementation of a
simple but efficient VHEE simulation model in matRad. A few
configurations were studied in order to validate the model
against accurate Monte Carlo simulations, demonstrating its
usefulness for carrying out preliminary studies involving
VHEE radiotherapy.},
keywords = {Monte Carlo (Other) / VHEE (Other) / beam model (Other) /
radiotherapy (Other) / treatment planning system (Other)},
cin = {E040},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39419015},
doi = {10.1002/mp.17392},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/294077},
}