guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network. > print |
| Home > Publications database > Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network. > print |
| 001 | 294309 | ||
| 005 | 20250425142755.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1007/s00330-024-11142-3 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:39455455 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0938-7994 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1432-1084 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1613-3749 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1613-3757 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a (ISSN |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a DES |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a SUPPLEMENTS) |2 ISSN |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2024-02142 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Liebert, Andrzej |0 0000-0002-8450-3021 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Heidelberg |c 2025 |b Springer |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1745584034_24709 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a #LA:E250# / 2025 May;35(5):2603-2616 |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a To investigate how different combinations of T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) impact the performance of virtual contrast-enhanced (vCE) breast MRI.The IRB-approved, retrospective study included 1064 multiparametric breast MRI scans (age: 52 ± 12 years) obtained from 2017 to 2020 (single site, two 3-T MRI). Eleven independent neural networks were trained to derive vCE images from varying input combinations of T1w, T2w, and multi-b-value DWI sequences (b-value = 50-1500 s/mm2). Three readers evaluated the vCE images with regard to qualitative scores of diagnostic image quality, image sharpness, satisfaction with contrast/signal-to-noise ratio, and lesion/non-mass enhancement conspicuity. Quantitative metrics (SSIM, PSNR, NRMSE, and median symmetrical accuracy) were analyzed and statistically compared between the input combinations for the full breast volume and both enhancing and non-enhancing target findings.The independent test set consisted of 187 cases. The quantitative metrics significantly improved in target findings when multi-b-value DWI sequences were included during vCE training (p < 0.05). Non-significant effects (p > 0.05) were observed for the quantitative metrics on the full breast volume when comparing input combinations including T1w. Using T1w and DWI acquisitions during vCE training is necessary to achieve high satisfaction with contrast/SNR and good conspicuity of the enhancing findings. The input combination of T1w, T2w, and DWI sequences with three b-values showed the best qualitative performance.vCE breast MRI performance is significantly influenced by input sequences. Quantitative metrics and visual quality of vCE images significantly benefit when multi b-value DWI is added to morphologic T1w-/T2w sequences as input for model training.Question How do different MRI sequences impact the performance of virtual contrast-enhanced (vCE) breast MRI? Findings The input combination of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences with three b-values showed the best qualitative performance. Clinical relevance While in the future neural networks providing virtual contrast-enhanced images might further improve accessibility to breast MRI, the significant influence of input data needs to be considered during translational research. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |c POF4-315 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Artificial intelligence |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Breast imaging |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Magnetic resonance imaging |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Neural network |2 Other |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schreiter, Hannes |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kapsner, Lorenz A |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Eberle, Jessica |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ehring, Chris M |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hadler, Dominique |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Brock, Luise |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Erber, Ramona |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Emons, Julius |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Laun, Frederik B |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Uder, Michael |b 10 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wenkel, Evelyn |b 11 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ohlmeyer, Sabine |b 12 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bickelhaupt, Sebastian |0 P:(DE-He78)d2d971750bce6217eb90fff9b01e61f9 |b 13 |e Last author |u dkfz |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1007/s00330-024-11142-3 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1472718-3 |n 5 |p 2603-2616 |t European radiology |v 35 |y 2025 |x 0938-7994 |
| 909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:294309 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 13 |6 P:(DE-He78)d2d971750bce6217eb90fff9b01e61f9 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2024 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Springer |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-19 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Springer |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-19 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b EUR RADIOL : 2022 |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2023-08-19 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b EUR RADIOL : 2022 |d 2023-08-19 |
| 920 | 2 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E250-20160331 |k E250 |l NWG KKE Multiparametrische Methoden zur Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E250-20160331 |k E250 |l NWG KKE Multiparametrische Methoden zur Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)E250-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|