guest ::
| Home > User submitted records > Comparing genome-scale metabolic models of the non-resistant Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433 and the multi-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583. > print |
| Home > User submitted records > Comparing genome-scale metabolic models of the non-resistant Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433 and the multi-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583. > print |
| 001 | 294552 | ||
| 005 | 20241118124308.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.07.006 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:38996920 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0168-1656 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1873-4863 |2 ISSN |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2024-02327 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 540 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Loghmani, Seyed Babak |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e First author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Comparing genome-scale metabolic models of the non-resistant Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433 and the multi-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2024 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1731929430_30512 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a ISSN 0168-1656 not unique: **2 hits**. |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Enterococcus faecalis is a versatile lactic acid bacterium with a large variety of implications for humans. While some strains of this species are pathobionts being resistant against most of the common antibiotics, other strains are regarded as biological protectants or even probiotics. Accordingly, E. faecalis strains largely differ in the size and content of their accessory genome. In this study, we describe the genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of E. faecalis ATCC 19433, a non-resistant human-associated strain. A comparison of the genome-scale metabolic model (GSM) of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 with a previously published GSM of the multi-resistant pathobiontic E. faecalis V583 reveals high similarities in the central metabolic abilities of these two human associated strains. This is reflected, e.g., in the identical amino acid auxotrophies. The ATCC 19433 strain, however, has a 14.1 % smaller genome than V583 and lacks the multiple antibiotic resistance genes and genes involved in capsule formation. Based on the measured metabolic fluxes at different growth rates, the energy demand at zero growth was calculated to be about 40 % lower for the ATCC 19433 strain compared to V583. Furthermore, the ATCC 19433 strain seems less prone to the depletion of amino acids utilizable for energy metabolism. This might hint at a lower overall energy demand of the ATCC 19433 strain as compared to V583. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung (POF4-312) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312 |c POF4-312 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Amino acid auxotrophies |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Energy demand |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Enterococcus faecalis |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Genome-scale metabolic model |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM Chemicals |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Enterococcus faecalis: genetics |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Enterococcus faecalis: metabolism |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Genome, Bacterial: genetics |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Metabolic Networks and Pathways: genetics |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Models, Biological |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial: genetics |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Humans |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents: pharmacology |2 MeSH |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Zitzow, Eric |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schwarzmüller, Luisa |0 P:(DE-He78)c0f06b8e8c4978a970ffe6531ded37b2 |b 2 |u dkfz |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Humboldt, Yvonne |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Eisenberg, Philip |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kreikemeyer, Bernd |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Veith, Nadine |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kummer, Ursula |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fiedler, Tomas |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.07.006 |g Vol. 392, p. 109 - 117 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2016476-2 |p 109 - 117 |t Journal of biotechnology |v 392 |y 2024 |x 0168-1656 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Bioquant, Center for Organismal Studies |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Rostock University Medical Centre, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-He78)c0f06b8e8c4978a970ffe6531ded37b2 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Rostock University Medical Centre, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Rostock University Medical Centre, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Rostock University Medical Centre, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Bioquant, Center for Organismal Studies |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Bioquant, Center for Organismal Studies |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Rostock University Medical Centre, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung |x 0 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-26 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Life Sciences |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b J BIOTECHNOL : 2022 |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2023-08-26 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-26 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)B050-20160331 |k B050 |l B050 Molekulare Genomanalyse |x 0 |
| 920 | 0 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)B050-20160331 |k B050 |l B050 Molekulare Genomanalyse |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a USER |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDBRELEVANT |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)B050-20160331 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|