% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Koeppel:294923,
author = {M. Koeppel and K. Steindorf$^*$ and M. Schmidt$^*$ and F.
Rosenberger and J. Wiskemann},
title = {{V}ariability in resistance training trajectories of breast
cancer patients undergoing therapy.},
journal = {Supportive care in cancer},
volume = {33},
number = {1},
issn = {0941-4355},
address = {New York,NY},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-02630},
pages = {12},
year = {2025},
note = {published online 10 December 2024},
abstract = {In resistance training (RT), the change in volume-load from
training sessions (TS) to TS is an indicator of training
progress. Resulting growth trajectories are likely to differ
between individuals. Understanding this variation is
important for exercise planning in general, but even more
for clinical populations. We investigated this variation in
breast cancer patients undergoing treatment.Data of 69
patients from two randomized controlled trails were
investigated. They conducted a 12-week RT program. We fitted
a quadratic Bayesian regression model to the baseline
standardized volume-load over the course of the
intervention. We allowed all parameters to vary both between
exercises and between individuals.We observed a positive
linear component of 0.093 $(95\%$ uncertainty interval (UI)
0.058 to 0.120) and a negative quadratic component of -
0.002 $(95\%$ UI -0.008 to 0.001) for the mean trajectory of
the change in volume-load. For the different exercises, we
observed a dispersion for both the linear (0.043, $95\%$ UI
0.018 to 0.082) and the quadratic component (0.002, $95\%$
UI < 0.001 to 0.004). Variation between individual appears
to be approximately four times larger. We also observed
between-exercise variation within individuals. Extrapolation
of the regression model indicates training progression
stagnates after 20.6 TS $(95\%$ UI 14.8 to 44.4).There is
substantial variation in RT response between breast cancer
patients undergoing tumor therapy and in-between exercises.
The non-linear trajectory indicates that training
progression will eventually plateau, demanding periodization
and timely modification.BEATE Study: NCT01106820, Date:
April 20, 2010; BEST Study: NCT01468766, Date: November 9,
2011.},
keywords = {Humans / Breast Neoplasms: therapy / Female / Resistance
Training: methods / Middle Aged / Bayes Theorem / Adult /
Aged / Adjuvant tumor treatment (Other) / Bayesian
statistics (Other) / Exercise oncology (Other) /
Hierarchical model (Other) / Response variability (Other)},
cin = {C110},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39656317},
doi = {10.1007/s00520-024-09001-4},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/294923},
}