% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hu:296206,
author = {Y. Hu$^*$ and E. Kharazmi$^*$ and Q. Liang$^*$ and K.
Sundquist and J. Sundquist and M. Fallah$^*$},
title = {{R}isk of colorectal cancer associated with frequency of
colorectal polyp diagnosis in relatives.},
journal = {Gastroenterology},
volume = {168},
number = {5},
issn = {0016-5085},
address = {Philadelphia, Pa. [u.a.]},
publisher = {Saunders},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00119},
pages = {931-938.e5},
year = {2025},
note = {#EA:C120#LA:C120# / Volume 168, Issue 5, May 2025, Pages
931-938.e5},
abstract = {We aimed to evaluate the association of frequency of polyp
diagnosis in relatives with the risk of overall and
early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC).We leveraged data from
nationwide Swedish family cancer datasets (1964-2018) to
calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for
individuals with a family history of polyp by frequency of
polyp diagnosis in family members.We followed up 11,676,043
individuals for up to 54 years. Compared with the risk in
individuals without a family history of colorectal tumor
(N=142,234), the risk of overall CRC was 1.4-fold in those
with 1 FDR with one-time polyp diagnosis $[95\%CI=1.3-1.4,$
N=11,035; early-onset SIR: 1.4 (1.3-1.5), N=742]. The risk
was significantly higher in individuals with 1 FDR with ≥2
times (frequent) polyp diagnoses [overall CRC: 1.8
(1.8-1.9); early-onset CRC=2.3 (2.0-2.6)]. A rather similar
risk was observed for individuals with ≥2 FDRs with
one-time polyp diagnosis [overall CRC: 1.9 (1.7-2.1);
early-onset CRC: 2.2 (1.5-2.9)]. Individuals with ≥2 FDRs
with frequent polyp diagnoses had a 2.4-fold overall risk
(2.2-2.7) and a 3.9-fold early-onset risk (2.8-5.3). Younger
age at polyp diagnosis in FDRs was associated with an
increased risk of CRC. A family history of polyp in
second-degree relatives was important only when there were
frequent diagnoses of polyp.A higher frequency of colorectal
polyp diagnosis in relatives is associated with a greater
risk of CRC, especially early-onset CRC. This risk is
independent of number of affected relatives or youngest age
at polyp diagnosis. These findings underscore the need for
more personalized CRC screening strategies that are tailored
to individuals with a family history of polyp.},
keywords = {Cancer prevention (Other) / Cancer screening (Other) /
Colonoscopy (Other) / Colorectal cancer (Other) / Colorectal
polyp (Other) / Family history (Other)},
cin = {C120},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39800079},
doi = {10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.030},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/296206},
}