% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pham:298182,
author = {S. D. T. Pham and C. Chatziantoniou and J. T. van Vliet and
R. J. van Tuijl and M. Bulk and M. Costagli and L. de
Rochefort and O. Kraff and M. Ladd$^*$ and K. Pine and I.
Ronen and J. C. W. Siero and M. Tosetti and A. Villringer
and G. J. Biessels and J. J. M. Zwanenburg},
title = {{B}lood {F}low {V}elocity {A}nalysis in {C}erebral
{P}erforating {A}rteries on 7{T} 2{D} {P}hase {C}ontrast
{MRI} with an {O}pen-{S}ource {S}oftware {T}ool ({SELMA}).},
journal = {Neuroinformatics},
volume = {23},
number = {2},
issn = {1539-2791},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00201},
pages = {11},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Blood flow velocity in the cerebral perforating arteries
can be quantified in a two-dimensional plane with phase
contrast magnetic imaging (2D PC-MRI). The velocity
pulsatility index (PI) can inform on the stiffness of these
perforating arteries, which is related to several
cerebrovascular diseases. Currently, there is no open-source
analysis tool for 2D PC-MRI data from these small vessels,
impeding the usage of these measurements. In this study we
present the Small vessEL MArker (SELMA) analysis software as
a novel, user-friendly, open-source tool for velocity
analysis in cerebral perforating arteries. The
implementation of the analysis algorithm in SELMA was
validated against previously published data with a
Bland-Altman analysis. The inter-rater reliability of SELMA
was assessed on PC-MRI data of sixty participants from three
MRI vendors between eight different sites. The mean velocity
(vmean) and velocity PI of SELMA was very similar to the
original results (vmean: mean difference ± standard
deviation: 0.1 ± 0.8 cm/s; velocity PI: mean difference ±
standard deviation: 0.01 ± 0.1) despite the slightly higher
number of detected vessels in SELMA (Ndetected: mean
difference ± standard deviation: 4 ± 9 vessels), which can
be explained by the vessel selection paradigm of SELMA. The
Dice Similarity Coefficient of drawn regions of interest
between two operators using SELMA was 0.91 (range 0.69-0.95)
and the overall intra-class coefficient for Ndetected,
vmean, and velocity PI were 0.92, 0.84, and 0.85,
respectively. The differences in the outcome measures was
higher between sites than vendors, indicating the challenges
in harmonizing the 2D PC-MRI sequence even across sites with
the same vendor. We show that SELMA is a consistent and
user-friendly analysis tool for small cerebral vessels.},
keywords = {Humans / Software / Male / Blood Flow Velocity: physiology
/ Female / Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods / Adult /
Cerebrovascular Circulation: physiology / Cerebral Arteries:
diagnostic imaging / Cerebral Arteries: physiology / Middle
Aged / Reproducibility of Results / Image Processing,
Computer-Assisted: methods / Algorithms / Aged / 2D PC-MRI
(Other) / Analysis tool (Other) / Blood flow velocity
(Other) / Perforating arteries (Other) / Pulsatility index
(Other)},
cin = {E020},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39841291},
doi = {10.1007/s12021-024-09703-4},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/298182},
}