% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Hinterberger:298608,
      author       = {A. Hinterberger and L. Trupka and S. Kortbein and R. Ebner
                      and N. Fink and M. F. Froelich and D. Nörenberg and C.
                      Wängler and B. Wängler and R. Schirrmacher and A.
                      Holzgreve and M. Brendel$^*$ and S. Corradini and C.
                      Auernhammer and J. Rübenthaler and F. Grawe},
      title        = {{S}tructured reporting of neuroendocrine tumors in
                      {PET}/{CT} using [18{F}]{S}i{TATE} - impact on
                      interdisciplinary communication.},
      journal      = {Scientific reports},
      volume       = {15},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2045-2322},
      address      = {[London]},
      publisher    = {Springer Nature},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2025-00308},
      pages        = {4793},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {Our retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the
                      impact of structured reporting (SR) using a self-developed
                      template on report quality compared to free-text reporting
                      (FTR) in [18F]SiTATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computer
                      Tomography (PET/CT) for the primary staging and therapy
                      monitoring of patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors
                      (NET). In total 50 patients were included. FTRs and SRs were
                      generated post-examination. All reports were evaluated by a
                      radiologist and a surgeon through a questionnaire to
                      determine their contribution to facilitating clinical
                      decision-making and to assess their completeness, linguistic
                      quality, and overall quality. SR significantly increased the
                      capacity of facilitating therapy decision-making from $32\%$
                      in FTR to $55\%$ in SR (p < 0.001). Trust in the report was
                      significantly higher in SR with a mean of 5.0 (SD = 0.5) vs.
                      4.7 (SD = 0.5) for FTR (p < 0.001). SR received
                      significantly higher mean ratings regarding linguistic
                      quality with 4.7 for SR vs. 4.4 for FTR (p = 0.004) and
                      overall report quality with a mean of 4.9 for SR vs. 4.6 for
                      FTR (p < 0.001). Concluding that SR enhances the overall
                      quality of reports in [18F]SiTATE-PET/CTs for NET staging,
                      serving as a tool to streamline clinical decision-making and
                      enhance interdisciplinary communication in the future.},
      keywords     = {Humans / Neuroendocrine Tumors: diagnostic imaging /
                      Neuroendocrine Tumors: pathology / Positron Emission
                      Tomography Computed Tomography: methods / Female / Male /
                      Middle Aged / Retrospective Studies / Aged / Adult /
                      Interdisciplinary Communication / Clinical Decision-Making /
                      Interdisciplinary communication (Other) / Neuroendocrine
                      tumor (Other) / PET/CT (Other) / Somatostatin receptor
                      (Other) / Structured reporting (Other)},
      cin          = {MU01},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:39922882},
      doi          = {10.1038/s41598-025-88999-x},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/298608},
}