% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Guberina:298610,
author = {M. Guberina$^*$ and M. Stuschke$^*$ and D. Flühs and L.
Jabbarli and T. Kiefer and E. Biewald and P. Rating and H.
Manke and S. Dalbah and C. Hoffmann and N. Guberina$^*$ and
C. Pöttgen and M. Fiorentzis and A. Foerster and T.
Grunewald and N. Bornfeld and W. Sauerwein and N. Bechrakis
and E. Sokolenko},
title = {{D}ose response relation for optic nerve atrophy at
low-dose rate brachytherapy of uveal melanoma.},
journal = {Radiotherapy and oncology},
volume = {205},
issn = {0167-8140},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00310},
pages = {110775},
year = {2025},
note = {Volume 205, April 2025, 110775},
abstract = {Dose-response relationships for optic neuropathy and optic
nerve atrophy after brachytherapy for posterior uveal
melanoma were poorly defined from previous studies. Here,
the outcome differences were analyzed in dependence on
dosimetric factors, the applicator type, and tumor dependent
variables.Primary objective was to evaluate the association
of applied dose and on-set of optic nerve atrophy after
brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma in order to allow
risk estimation for new patients.This retrospective study
was performed at a single high volume centre for ocular
oncology. Patients receiving brachytherapy with
Ruthenium-106 applicators for posterior uveal melanoma with
a maximum distance between optic nerve and the nearest tumor
margin of 4 optical disc diameters and follow-up with fundus
photographs were included. The dose distribution at the
optic nerve was reconstructed from the fundus photographs at
latest follow-up and the dose-distribution of the applicator
using a dedicated software. A first mask with important
structural elements such as optic nerve, macula, tumor and
vessels was first superimposed on the fundus photograph and
adapted to the real contours. In a second step, an
applicator contour mask was adapted to the radiation scar in
order to calculate the dose distribution in all structures.
Dose-response relations were obtained by weighted logistic
regression.The maximum dose at the optic disc (ODmax) in
this group of 109 patients ranged from 5.8 Gy - 242.2 Gy,
median 48.7 Gy. Optic nerve atrophy was observed in
29patients. Median time to optic radiation induced optic
nerve atrophy was 18 months. Using weighted logistic
regression, the dependence of optic nerve atrophy on ODmax
was significant (p = 0.0001, chi2 test). There was a
considerable interobserver variability in ODmax values (p <
0.02, signed rank test). An additional factor influencing
the dose-response was the applicator type (p = 0.0315, chi2
test). The ODmax for a probability of optic nerve atrophy of
50 $\%$ (ED50) were 77.6 Gy ± 7.0 Gy for patients treated
with notched COB applicators and 53.2 Gy ± 8.2 Gy for
patients with other applicators. Including the applicator
type, the area under ROC curve reached a value of 0.857 (95
$\%-CI:$ 0.793-0.921) for the logistic model with ODmax. The
ED50 for optic nerve neuropathy, classified as grade ≥ 1
toxicity, was estimated to be 46.9 Gy ± 4.1 Gy for the
maximum dose at the optic disc.Significant dose-response
curves were found for optic nerve atrophy at low dose rate
brachytherapy. A standard position of COB applicators was
identified that allows estimation of the dose-response
relation from the scleral dose of the applicator for risk
estimation without fundus photographs. This larger data set
enhances the knowledge of dose-response relationships for
irradiation near the optic nerve.},
keywords = {Dose response relation (Other) / Low-dose rate
brachytherapy (Other) / Malignant eye tumor (Other) / Optic
nerve atrophy (Other) / Optic neuropathy (Other) /
Optimizing treatment (Other) / Outcome (Other) / Radiation
(Other) / Uveal Melanoma (Other)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39922315},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110775},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/298610},
}