% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Prue:298944,
author = {G. Prue and J. Czamanski-Cohen and A. P. Kassianos and S.
Pilleron and A. Ladas and A. Akcakaya Can and C.
Roldán-Jiménez and C. L. Degi and G. Işcan and S. Arslan
and A. G. E. M. de Boer and A. Celebic and A.
Doñate-Martínez and T. Alhambra-Borrás and B. Mitrevski
and C. Marzorati and G. Pravettoni and R. Grasso and E.
Nazik and E. Pawlowska and I. Mucalo and J. P. Browne and K.
Tripkovic and K. Vojvodic and M. Karekla and M. Moschofidou
and S. B. Bayram and T. Brandão and V. Arndt$^*$ and P.
Jaswal and R. Semerci and G. Bozkul and E. Sahin and I.
Toygar and M. Frountzas and R. M. Martins and M. Jefford and
D. Keane and J. Hegarty},
title = {{M}odels of care and associated targeted implementation
strategies for cancer survivorship support in {E}urope: a
scoping review protocol.},
journal = {BMJ open},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
issn = {2044-6055},
address = {London},
publisher = {BMJ Publishing Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00378},
pages = {e085456},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Cancer and its treatments can lead to a wide range of
side-effects that can persist long after treatments have
ended. Across Europe, survivorship care is traditionally
hospital-based specialist-led follow-up, leading to gaps in
supportive care. Improved screening, diagnosis and treatment
increase survival rates. With more individuals living with,
through and beyond cancer, the predominance of the
hospital-based specialist model is unsustainable, costly and
resource-intensive. An understanding of what alternative
Models of Care are available and the barriers and
facilitators to their implementation is a first step towards
enhancing supportive care across the cancer journey. The aim
of this scoping review is to source and synthesise
information from studies evaluating patient-oriented models
of cancer survivorship supportive care for adults in
Europe.The scoping review will be reported in accordance
with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews
and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines and
will be guided by a six-stage methodological framework. A
search strategy has been developed according to the
Population, Concept and Context structure and will be
applied to seven databases. A targeted search of grey
literature will be completed. All identified records will be
screened using predefined eligibility criteria by at least
two researchers and undergo full-text review for inclusion.
Data pertaining to the conceptualisation, evaluation and
implementation of sourced Models of Care will be
extracted.As there is no primary data, ethical approval is
not required. This review will be conducted as part of the
EU COST Action CA21152-Implementation Network Europe for
Cancer Survivorship Care. The protocol and subsequent
scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
The Action involves representatives from most countries
across Europe which will assist with the dissemination of
the work to key stakeholders.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
keywords = {Humans / Europe / Cancer Survivors / Neoplasms: therapy /
Research Design / Survivorship / Delivery of Health Care,
Integrated (Other) / Health Services (Other) / Health policy
(Other) / International health services (Other) /
Patient-Centered Care (Other) / Review (Other)},
cin = {C071},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C071-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39956597},
pmc = {pmc:PMC11831281},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085456},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/298944},
}