% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Frick:299569,
author = {S. Frick and M. Schneider and D. Thorwarth$^*$ and R.-P.
Kapsch},
title = {{D}etermination of output correction factors in magnetic
fields using two methods for two detectors at the central
axis.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {70},
number = {6},
issn = {0031-9155},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00510},
pages = {065008},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Objective.Commissioning an MR-linac treatment planning
system requires output correction
factors,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr, for detectors to
accurately measure the linac's output at various field
sizes. In this study,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrwas
determined at the central axis using two methods: one that
combines the corrections for the influence of the magnetic
field and the small field in a single factor
(kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr), and a second that isolates the
magnetic field's influence, allowing the use of output
correction factors without a magnetic
field,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr, from literature for
determiningkB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Approach.To
determinekB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrand examine its behaviour
across different photon energies and magnetic flux
densitiesBin small fields, measurements with an ionization
chamber (0.07 cm3sensitive volume) and a solid-state
detector were carried out at an experimental facility for
both approaches. Changes in absorbed dose to water with
field size were determined via Monte Carlo simulations. To
evaluate clinical applicability, additional measurements
were conducted on a 1.5 T MR-linac.Main results.Both methods
determined comparablekB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrresults. For
field sizes >3 × 3 cm2,Branging from -1.5 to 1.5 T and
photon energies of 6 and 8 MV, no change
ofkQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsras a function of the magnetic field
was observed. Comparison with measurement results from the
1.5 T MR-linac confirm this. For ⩽3 × 3
cm2,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrdepends on photon energy andB.
For 1.5 T and 6 MV,BreduceskQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrup to $3\%$
for the ionization chamber and up to $7\%$ for the
solid-state
detector.Significance.kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrwere
successfully determined for two detectors, enabling their
use at a 1.5 T MR-linac. For field sizes of >3 × 3
cm2,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsris one for most detectors
suitable for small field dosimetry for all available
perpendicular MR-linac systems, as confirmed in the
literature. For these field sizes and detectors, the
correction factor accounting for the dosimeter response
change in the reference field due to the magnetic
field,kB→,Qmsrfmsr, can be used for cross-calibration.
Therefore, future research may only focus on small field
sizes.},
keywords = {Magnetic Fields / Radiometry: instrumentation / Monte Carlo
Method / Particle Accelerators: instrumentation / Magnetic
Resonance Imaging: instrumentation / MR-guided radiation
therapy (Other) / magnetic field correction factor (Other) /
output correction factor (Other) / small field dosimetry
(Other)},
cin = {TU01},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)TU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39983310},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/adb934},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/299569},
}