001     299578
005     20250422093831.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.003
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:40057457
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1865-9217
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2212-0289
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-00519
041 _ _ |a German
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Wagner, Anna S
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Cancer-related fatigue: How (good) is the quality of care at cancer care facilities in Germany? [Fatigue bei Krebs: Wie (gut) sind Betroffene an onkologischen Einrichtungen in Deutschland versorgt?]
260 _ _ |a München [u.a.]
|c 2025
|b Elsevier, Urban & Fischer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1745307477_26886
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2025 May:194:40-47
520 _ _ |a One of the most common sequelae of cancer and/or its treatment is cancer-related fatigue (CRF). For those affected, CRF is often accompanied by considerable, even long-term impairment. This makes it all the more important to examine how care is provided in Germany and to what extent guideline recommendations are implemented in clinical practice.In a Germany-wide questionnaire survey, inpatient and outpatient oncological cancer care facilities were asked to describe their approach to CRF (information and education, screening, diagnostics), local treatment options, and clinical trials.A total of 145 facilities participated, including 11 comprehensive cancer centers, 35 organ-specific cancer centers, 22 hospitals with a (hemato-)oncology unit, 29 outpatient (hemato-)oncology practices, 48 outpatient cancer counseling units. Nearly all the facilities reported that patients are provided verbal health information (per groups: 90.9%, 88.6%, 90.9%, 96.9%, 72.9%); less frequently in written form (90.9%, 54.3%, 59.1%, 48.3%, 87.5%). A systematic screening for CRF is conducted in up to one-third of the facilities (per groups: 27.3%, 20.0%, 31.8%, 17.2%, 8.3%). A standardized procedure for further clarification of CRF is available at a small number of institutions (0%, 11.4%, 13.6%, 6.9%, 2.1%). Exercise (90.9%, 82.9%, 72.7%, 79.3%, 89.6%) and psychotherapeutic services (90.9%, 68.6%, 86.4%, 62.1%, 68.8%) are most frequently actively recommended to patients with CRF across the facility groups.With regard to the systematization of screening and diagnosis of CRF as well as the provision of information material, there is a clear discrepancy between guideline recommendations and everyday clinical practice.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Bedarfsanalyse
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Befragung
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Cancer care
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Cancer-related fatigue
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Krebsassoziierte Fatigue
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Krebsversorgung
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Needs assessment
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Supportive Therapie
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Supportive care
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Survey
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Milzer, Marlena
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Kiermeier, Senta
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Schmidt, Martina E
|0 P:(DE-He78)2def8f8594c8f797f5ed4398258c6cac
|b 3
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Nguyen, Truong D
|0 P:(DE-He78)ed72386011d32b57800b051dd58da058
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Steindorf, Karen
|0 P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756
|b 5
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Maatouk, Imad
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.003
|g p. S1865921725000509
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2413601-3
|p 40-47
|t Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
|v 194
|y 2025
|x 1865-9217
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:299578
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)2def8f8594c8f797f5ed4398258c6cac
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)ed72386011d32b57800b051dd58da058
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-21
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331
|k C110
|l Bewegung, Präventionsforschung und Krebs
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21