% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Huang:299588,
author = {L. Huang and A. Thummerer and C. I. Papadopoulou and S.
Corradini and C. Belka$^*$ and M. Riboldi and C. Kurz and G.
Landry},
title = {{V}alidation of patient-specific deep learning markerless
lung tumor tracking aided by 4{DCBCT}.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {70},
number = {6},
issn = {0031-9155},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00529},
pages = {065001},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Objective. Tracking tumors with multi-leaf collimators and
x-ray imaging can be a cost-effective motion management
method to reduce internal target volume margins for lung
cancer patients, sparing normal tissues while ensuring
target coverage. To realize that, accurate tumor
localization on x-ray images is essential. We aimed to
develop a systematic method for automatically generating
tumor segmentation ground truth (GT) on cone-beam computed
tomography (CBCT) projections and use it to help refine and
validate our patient-specific AI-based tumor localization
model.Approach. To obtain the tumor segmentation GT on CBCT
projections, we propose a 4DCBCT-aided GT generation
pipeline consisting of three steps: breathing phase
extraction and 10-phase 4DCBCT reconstruction, manual
segmentation on phase $50\%$ followed by deformable contour
propagation to other phases, and forward projection of the
3D segmentation to the CBCT projection of the corresponding
phase. We then used the CBCT projections from one fraction
in the angular range of [-10∘, 10∘] and [80∘, 100∘]
to refine a Retina U-Net baseline model, which was
pretrained on 1140231 digitally reconstructed radiographs
generated from a public lung dataset for automatic tumor
delineation on projections, and used later-fraction CBCT
projections in the same angular range for testing. Six LMU
University Hospital patient CBCT projection sets were
reserved for validation and 11 for testing. Tracking
accuracy was evaluated as the center-of-mass (COM) error and
the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between the predicted
and ground-truth segmentations.Main results. Over the 11
testing patients, each with around 40 CBCT projections
tested, the patient refined models had a mean COM error of
2.3 ± 0.9 mm/4.2 ± 1.7 mm and a mean DSC of 0.83 ±
0.06/0.72 ± 0.13 for angles within [-10∘, 10∘] /
[80∘, 100∘]. The mean inference time was 68 ms/frame.
The patient-specific training segmentation loss was found to
be correlated to the segmentation performance at [-10∘,
10∘].Significance. Our proposed approach allows
patient-specific real-time markerless lung tumor tracking,
which could be validated thanks to the novel 4DCBCT-aided GT
generation approach.},
keywords = {Lung Neoplasms: diagnostic imaging / Humans / Deep Learning
/ Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: methods / Four-Dimensional
Computed Tomography: methods / Image Processing,
Computer-Assisted: methods / 4DCBCT (Other) / AI (Other) /
lung tumor targeting (Other) / markerless tracking (Other) /
patient-specific (Other)},
cin = {MU01},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39978071},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/adb89c},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/299588},
}