%0 Journal Article
%A Faust, Jonas Frederik
%A Speier, Peter
%A Krafft, Axel Joachim
%A Patil, Sunil
%A Seethamraju, Ravi Teja
%A Ladd, Mark
%A Maier, Florian
%T Positive susceptibility-based contrast imaging with dephased balanced steady-state free precession.
%J Magnetic resonance in medicine
%V 94
%N 1
%@ 1522-2594
%C New York, NY [u.a.]
%I Wiley-Liss
%M DKFZ-2025-00537
%P 59-72
%D 2025
%Z Volume 94, Issue 1, July 2025 , Pages 59-72
%X Dephasing gradients can be introduced within a variety of gradient-echo pulse sequences to delineate local susceptibility changes ('White-Marker' phenomenon), e.g., for the visualization of metallic interventional devices which are otherwise difficult to display. We investigated dephased balanced steady-state free precession (d-bSSFP) and compared it with similar contrast techniques: dephased RF-spoiled fast low-angle shot (d-FLASH) and dephased steady-state free precession (d-SSFP).A signal model was formulated to describe the positive contrast in d-bSSFP. For the example of an MR-compatible aspiration needle, the positive contrast artifact appearance was theoretically derived, and the model was verified in a water phantom at B0 = 0.55 T. Model accuracy was evaluated by comparing the measured artifact size (for TEs between 3.4 ms and 50 ms) and the signal magnitude to the model prediction.While positive contrast artifacts for d-FLASH and d-SSFP are axisymmetric with respect to the generating object, for d-bSSFP, a point-symmetric susceptibility artifact arises for a cylindrical needle due to the characteristic signal formation. The observed d-bSSFP artifact size was in accordance with the model (error < 1 mm). Measured (predicted) cumulated artifact signal was 1.13 ± 0.07 (1.27) times higher and 5.9 ± 0.4 times higher than the d-SSFP and d-FLASH cumulated artifact signal, respectively. In contrast to d-SSFP, the d-bSSFP artifact was robust against banding artifacts.d-bSSFP contrast is well described by the introduced model. Positive contrast artifacts show higher cumulated signal magnitude, symmetry, and homogeneity compared with d-FLASH and d-SSFP and can therefore improve device visualization and potentially device localization.
%K bSSFP (Other)
%K dephased MRI (Other)
%K interventional MRI (Other)
%K positive contrast (Other)
%K white‐marker imaging (Other)
%F PUB:(DE-HGF)16
%9 Journal Article
%$ pmid:40079240
%R 10.1002/mrm.30421
%U https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/299782