% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pizzato:300228,
author = {M. Pizzato and V. McCormack and L. Dossus and U. Al-Alem
and C. Delpierre and S. Lamy and A. Macciotta and F. Ricceri
and L. Mellemkjær and A. Tjønneland and C. C. Dahm and C.
S. Antoniussen and P. Guénel and A. Fournier and P. Frenoy
and M. B. Schulze and R. Kaaks$^*$ and R.
Turzanski-Fortner$^*$ and P. Ferrari and V. Pala and S.
Panico and R. Tumino and G. Masala and K. S. Olsen and I. T.
Gram and T. Braaten and C. Castro and P. A. Etxezarreta and
A. Atxega and J. M. Huerta and M.-J. Sánchez and M. Guevara
and T. Gathani and S. Rinaldi and P. Vineis and S.
Vaccarella},
title = {{E}ducation level and risk of breast cancer by tumor
subtype in the {EPIC} cohort.},
journal = {International journal of cancer},
volume = {157},
number = {4},
issn = {0020-7136},
address = {Bognor Regis},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00690},
pages = {672-686},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Aug 15;157(4):672-686},
abstract = {Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with subtypes
based on receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER],
progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth
factor receptor 2 [HER2]), influencing prognosis and
treatment. A higher socioeconomic position (SEP) is
associated with an increased BC risk, but its relation to BC
subtypes is less clear. This study analyzed 311,631 women
from the EPIC cohort, focusing on the incidence of in situ
and invasive BC (overall and by receptor status and
subtype). Educational attainment was used as a proxy for
SEP, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox
regression models. Mediation analyses were performed to
evaluate the extent to which selected risk factors explained
the educational gradient. Over 14 years, 14,432 BC cases
were identified, including 12,863 invasive cases. Lower
education was associated with a reduced risk of both in situ
and invasive BCs. The HRs for primary versus tertiary
education were 0.61 $(95\%$ CI 0.49-0.73) for in situ and
0.81 $(95\%$ CI 0.75-0.87) for invasive BC overall, with
similar reductions across ER-positive, PR-positive,
HER2-positive, Luminal A, BH-, and BH+. No significant
association was found between education and ER-negative, and
HER2-enriched BCs. Reproductive and lifestyle factors
explained $20-40\%$ of the educational differences in BC
risk. While many of the risk factors through which education
impacts the development of subtype-specific BC were
identified, others remain to be fully elucidated.
Differences in screening attendance could partially explain
the higher ER-positive BC risk among highly educated; this
study further contributes to the understanding of the
complex nature of BC in terms of its social gradient and
aetiology.},
keywords = {breast cancer risk (Other) / education level (Other) /
estrogen receptor (Other) / molecular subtypes (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40170258},
doi = {10.1002/ijc.35413},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/300228},
}