% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Keck:300291,
author = {M.-K. Keck$^*$ and A. Tietze and B. Bison and S. Avula and
J. Engelhardt and C. Faure-Conter and T. Fenouil and D.
Figarella-Branger and E. Goebell and J. Gojo and C. Haberler
and J. Hakumäki and J. T. Hayden and L. S. Korhonen and E.
Koscielniak and C. M. Kramm and M. E. G. Kranendonk and M.
Lequin and L. E. Ludlow and D. Meyronet and P. Nyman and I.
Øra and T. Perwein and J. Pesola and T. Rauramaa and R.
Reddingius and D. Samuel and A. Y. N. Schouten-van Meeteren
and A. Sexton-Oates and A. Vasiljevic and T. von Kalle and
A. K. Wefers and P. Wesseling and J. Zamecnik and M.
Zapotocky and K. von Hoff and D. Jones$^*$},
title = {{C}omparative {C}linical and {I}maging-{B}ased {E}valuation
of {T}herapeutic {M}odalities in {CNS} {E}mbryonal {T}umours
{W}ith {PLAGL} {A}mplification.},
journal = {Neuropathology $\&$ applied neurobiology},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
issn = {0305-1846},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00744},
pages = {e70015},
year = {2025},
note = {#EA:B360#LA:B360#},
abstract = {Embryonal tumours with PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 amplification (ET,
PLAGL) show substantial heterogeneity regarding their
clinical characteristics and have been treated
inconsistently, resulting in diverse outcomes. In this
study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical behaviour of ET,
PLAGL and elucidate their response pattern across the
different applied treatment regimens.We conducted an
in-depth retrospective analysis of clinical and serial
imaging data of 18 patients with ET, PLAGL (nine each of
PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 amplified).Patients with PLAGL1-amplified
tumours (ET, PLAGL1) had fewer relapses (3/9), while
PLAGL2-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL2) were prone to early
relapse or progression (8/9) and to distant, leptomeningeal
and intraventricular relapses. Progression-free survival
differed significantly between the subtypes (log-rank test,
p = 0.0055). Postoperative treatment included chemotherapy
(n = 17, various protocols), alone (n = 8) or combined with
radiotherapy (n = 9). Responses to chemotherapy were
observed in both subtypes, and incomplete resection was not
associated with inferior survival. All three survivors with
ET, PLAGL2 were treated with induction and high-dose
chemotherapy with (n = 1-low-dose CSI and boost) or without
(n = 2) radiotherapy, whereas five patients with less
intensive chemotherapy relapsed. All six survivors with ET,
PLAGL1 were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens,
with (n = 4-local radiotherapy n = 3; CSI and boost n = 1)
or without (n = 2) radiotherapy. Two patients with ET,
PLAGL1 relapsed after 8 years.Adjuvant therapy should be
considered for all ET, PLAGL patients: Patients with ET,
PLAGL2 might benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens.
In contrast, patients with ET, PLAGL1 showed superior
outcomes without high-dose chemotherapy or craniospinal
irradiation.},
keywords = {Humans / Male / Female / Adult / Adolescent / Child /
Child, Preschool / Gene Amplification / Middle Aged /
DNA-Binding Proteins: genetics / Brain Neoplasms: genetics /
Brain Neoplasms: therapy / PLAGL1 (Other) / PLAGL2 (Other) /
ET, PLAGL (Other) / embryonal CNS tumour (Other) / treatment
(Other) / DNA-Binding Proteins (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {B360},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B360-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40196918},
doi = {DOI:10.1111/nan.70015},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/300291},
}