001     300711
005     20250630102605.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/mrm.30525
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:40294090
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1522-2594
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0740-3194
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-00891
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Gallinnis, Patrik Jan
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Comparison of twelve-layer concentric object (TLCO) and Line segmentations methods to determine the renal corticomedullary sodium gradient (CMSG) with a 3 T MRI.
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|c 2025
|b Wiley-Liss
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1751271924_20910
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2025 Sep;94(3):1318-1325
520 _ _ |a 23Na MRI is a functional imaging technique that facilitates measurements of the renal corticomedullary sodium gradient (CMSG). The CMSG can be determined by a region of interest (ROI) in the renal parenchyma along the corticomedullary axis (Line method) or by dividing the renal parenchyma into concentric layers, using the twelve-layer concentric objects (TLCO) method. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences, strengths, and weaknesses in determining the CMSG using these methods.Ten healthy volunteers were examined on a 3 T MRI-system. 23Na images were acquired using a double-tuned 23Na/1H surface coil and a golden angle (GA) density-adapted 3D radial (DA-3D-RAD) sequence. The CMSG was determined with the Line and TLCO methods. Intra- and inter-reader analyses were performed by two radiologists.The evaluated CMSG by the two methods does not differ statistically significantly. Compared to the Line method, the TLCO method provides improved results in terms of reliability, precision, reproducibility, and concordance in intra- and inter-reader analyses. A CMSG of (6.7 ± 2.6) mM/mm was determined using the TLCO method in the segmentation process with the lowest standard deviation.The TLCO method shows superior performance in determining the CMSG compared to the Line method. Accordingly, the use of the TLCO method is recommended for future renal CMSG studies.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a corticomedullary 23Na gradient
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a kidney sodium MRI
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a sodium MRI23Na MR imaging
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a twelve‐layer concentric objects (TLCO) method
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Möller, Rika
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ljimani, Alexandra
|0 0000-0002-9748-9927
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Cabuk, Yusuf
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Scheuer, Marie
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Böttger, Charlotte
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Liang, Cecilia
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Nagel, Armin
|0 P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011
|b 7
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Bechler, Eric
|0 0000-0001-8864-4879
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Wittsack, Hans-Jörg
|0 0000-0002-5830-423X
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Müller-Lutz, Anja
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Kamp, Benedikt
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/mrm.30525
|g p. mrm.30525
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1493786-4
|n 3
|p 1318-1325
|t Magnetic resonance in medicine
|v 94
|y 2025
|x 1522-2594
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:300711
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2025-01-02
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2025-01-02
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2025-01-02
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
|k E020
|l E020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21