% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Iliaskou:301265,
author = {C. Iliaskou$^*$ and M. Gainey$^*$ and B. Thomann$^*$ and M.
Kollefrath$^*$ and R. Saum$^*$ and E. Gkika$^*$ and U. A.
Wittel and D. A. Ruess and A.-L. Grosu$^*$ and D.
Baltas$^*$},
title = {{D}evelopment of a {TLD}-100 based set up for in vivo
dosimetry in {I}ntraoperative {E}lectron {B}eam {R}adiation
{T}herapy ({IOERT}): an experimental and clinical
evaluation.},
journal = {Zeitschrift für medizinische Physik},
volume = {nn},
issn = {0939-3889},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00950},
pages = {nn},
year = {2025},
note = {epub},
abstract = {This study presents an in-house developed set-up enabling
the placement of multiple TLDs over the target region, for
in vivo dosimetry in intraoperative electron beam
radiotherapy (IOERT).TLD-100 (LiF:MgTi) rods were calibrated
at 10 Gy and their response was determined for the nominal
electron energies of the Mobetron LINAC within the dose
range from 4 Gy to 20 Gy. Irradiation of various set-ups was
performed using the ionisation chambers (IC) ROOS parallel
plate 34001 (PTW, Freiburg) and 3D Semiflex 31021 (PTW,
Freiburg), a microdiamond detector 60019 (PTW, Freiburg) and
EBT3 films (Ashland™) to investigate beam perturbations
that may result due to the structure of the set up. EGSnrc
Monte Carlo (MC) simulations evaluated the response of the
TLDs in clinical beams of the available electron energies,
the influence of the catheter to the TLD dose scoring and
the depth dependence of the TLD dose assessment. TLD
measurements in-phantoms and in patient in vivo were
realised and compared to the expected doses estimated using
data of water phantom measurements and 3D MC electron dose
calculations of a dedicated IOERT treatment planning system
(Radiance TPS- GmV, Tres Cantos, Madrid).MC and measurements
verified that no energy correction is needed for the used
electron beams. Correction factors for the dose non-linear
response were evaluated. High resolution dose measurements
showed local hot spots beneath the flap. However, there are
no significant perturbations of the electron beam or on the
dose delivery to the targeted volume. MC simulations
demonstrated no signal attenuation due to the catheter and 1
$\%$ effect of the depth of TLD measurement relative to the
depth of calibration was noted. TLD measurements in phantom
set-ups agreed with expected doses with less than 2.6 $\%$
in phantoms and by 1 $\%$ in patient in vivo.Our results
demonstrate the suitability of using the implemented
TLD-based workflow for in vivo dosimetry purposes in the
operation room (OR) environment.},
keywords = {IOERT (Other) / TLD-100 dosimetry (Other) / in vivo
dosimetry (Other)},
cin = {FR01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)FR01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40345917},
doi = {10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.04.007},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/301265},
}