% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{vonTresckow:301266,
author = {B. von Tresckow$^*$ and P. Abrisqueta and I. Zamanillo and
Á. S. Pareja and Y. Kuang and J. Uyei and M. Shah and L.
Walsh and E. Thorley and K. Cantos and E. Rashidi and C.
Hampp and J. J. Jalbert and A. N. Archambault and Y. Xu and
S. Aggarwal and S. Ambati and H. Mohamed and Q. Ma and A.
Jiménez-Ubieto},
title = {{P}rognostic {F}actors and {E}ffect {M}odifiers in
{P}atients {W}ith {R}elapse or {R}efractory {D}iffuse
{L}arge {B}-{C}ell {L}ymphoma {A}fter {T}wo {L}ines of
{T}herapy: {A} {S}ystematic {L}iterature and {E}xpert
{C}linical {R}eview.},
journal = {European journal of haematology},
volume = {115},
number = {2},
issn = {0902-4441},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00951},
pages = {104-116},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Aug;115(2):104-116},
abstract = {The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR)
combined with expert clinical review was to identify and
rank prognostic factors and effect measure modifiers (EMMs)
systematically and comprehensively in patients with relapsed
or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
who initiate treatment after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy
(LoTs; 3L+ R/R DLBCL).We performed an SLR of studies
published between 2016 and 2021 and extracted study
characteristics, prognostic factors, and EMMs. This was
followed by clinical review and ranking of findings by
subject matter experts using questionnaires, follow-up
interviews, and quantitative ranking.Across 46 included
studies, the SLR identified 36 prognostic factors
significantly associated with ≥ 1 clinical outcome. Based
on subject matter expert ranking of the SLR-derived list,
the five most important prognostic variables in descending
order are: early chemo-immunotherapy failure, Eastern
Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, refractory to
last LoT, number of prior LoTs, and double- or triple-hit
lymphoma.This SLR and expert clinical review is the first to
provide a comprehensive assessment of prognostic factors for
3L+ R/R DLBCL. No statistically significant EMMs were
identified. This robust multi-method approach can assist in
selecting prognostic variables for comparative analyses
between real-world studies and clinical trials.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
keywords = {comparative effectiveness research (Other) / diffuse large
B‐cell lymphoma (Other) / systematic review (Other)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40344463},
doi = {10.1111/ejh.14423},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/301266},
}