% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Trautwein:301541,
author = {N. F. Trautwein and S. Mattern and M. Hinterleitner and G.
Reischl and R. Schirrmacher and V. Steger and S. Nadalin and
K. Nikolaou$^*$ and J. Schwenck and S. Singer and C. la
Fougère$^*$},
title = {{H}istologic {E}x {V}ivo {V}alidation of the
[18{F}]{SITATE} {S}omatostatin {R}eceptor {PET} {T}racer.},
journal = {Journal of nuclear medicine},
volume = {66},
number = {8},
issn = {0097-9058},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Soc.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01062},
pages = {1204-1209},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Aug 1;66(8):1204-1209},
abstract = {Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs), such as
[68Ga]Ga-DOTA SSAs, have transformed imaging and therapeutic
strategies. However, their use is constrained by the high
cost of generators and their short half-life. In contrast,
[18F]SITATE presents a promising alternative, offering the
advantage of a longer half-life than 68Ga, along with the
cost-effectiveness of cyclotron-based production. This study
evaluated the first histologic ex vivo validation of
[18F]SITATE. Methods: This study retrospectively included 47
patients $(57\%$ male; mean age, 66.9 ± 14.9 y) with
histologically confirmed well-differentiated neuroendocrine
neoplasms who underwent [18F]SITATE PET followed by surgery
within 4 mo. Lesion uptake was quantified using SUVmean,
SUVpeak, SUVmax, and tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR). Histologic
somatostatin receptor (SSTR) type 2 expression was
determined using histological scores (H-scores), with
thresholds defining SSTR scores 1-3. The accuracy of PET
imaging for preoperative metastatic detection was evaluated
against surgical histology. Results: PET imaging
demonstrated a significant correlation between [18F]SITATE
uptake (SUVmean and TLR) and SSTR type 2 H-scores (r = 0.618
and 0.622, respectively; P < 0.0001). SSTR score 3
correlated with increased SUVmean and TLR (P < 0.0001).
Among 35 patients with primary resection and
lymphadenectomy, PET achieved a sensitivity of $73.9\%$ and
specificity of $100\%.$ Conclusion: [18F]SITATE PET imaging
strongly correlates with histologic SSTR expression,
demonstrating utility in staging and guiding therapeutic
decisions in neuroendocrine neoplasms. This 18F-labeled
tracer shows specificity comparable to historical
[68Ga]Ga-DOTA SSA data, whereas an increase in sensitivity
for the detection of locoregional metastases appears
possible. Further head-to-head comparisons of [18F]SITATE
with traditional [68Ga]Ga-DOTA SSA and histologic validation
are warranted to optimize its diagnostic accuracy and
clinical impact.},
keywords = {PET (Other) / SSTR PET (Other) / [18F]SITATE (Other) /
neuroendocrine neoplasms (Other) / oncology (Other) /
radiotracer tissue kinetics (Other)},
cin = {TU01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)TU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40404394},
doi = {10.2967/jnumed.125.269619},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/301541},
}