% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Httner:301547,
author = {F. J. Hüttner and R. Klotz and N. A. Giese and B. Kong and
A. Ahmed$^*$ and D. Merz and A. Pöchmann$^*$ and I.
Burghaus and T. Hackert and O. Strobel and A. L. Mihaljevic
and C. W. Michalski and M. W. Büchler and M. K. Diener},
title = {{P}ancreatic resection with perioperative drug repurposing
of propranolol and etodolac - the phase {II} randomized
controlled {PROSPER} trial.},
journal = {Langenbeck's archives of surgery},
volume = {410},
number = {1},
issn = {0023-8236},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01068},
pages = {168},
year = {2025},
abstract = {The perioperative period is characterized by psychological
stress and inflammatory reactions that can contribute to
disease recurrence or metastatic spread. These reactions are
mediated particularly by catecholamines and prostaglandins.
The PROSPER trial aimed to evaluate whether a perioperative
drug repurposing with a non-selective betablocker
(propranolol) and a COX-2 inhibitor (etodolac) is feasible
and safe in the setting of pancreatic cancer
surgery.Patients undergoing partial pancreatoduodenectomy
for pancreatic cancer were randomized to perioperative
treatment with propranolol and etodolac or placebo. Main
safety endpoint was the rate of serious adverse events (SAE)
and the main feasibility endpoint was adherence. Overall and
disease-free survival (DFS) as well as recurrences were
assessed as efficacy parameters and the trial was
accompanied by a translational study.The trial was
prematurely closed due to slow recruitment. 26 patients were
randomized, but 6 never started trial medication. Finally, 9
patients received the trial medication and 11 patients
placebo. There were 6 SAE in the treatment vs. 14 in the
placebo group. Adherence was lower in the treatment group,
but without statistically significance. Median DFS was 16.36
months $(95\%-CI$ 1.18 - not reached) in verum vs. 11.25
$(95\%-CI$ 2.2 - 17.25) in placebo group. The rate of
distant recurrences was $11.1\%$ in verum vs. $54.5\%$ in
placebo group.There were no safety concerns, but the trial
intervention was not feasible given slow recruitment and
limited adherence. However, the translational study and
preliminary efficacy data revealed some promising findings,
warranting further investigation.DRKS00014054.},
keywords = {Humans / Male / Female / Middle Aged / Pancreatic
Neoplasms: surgery / Pancreatic Neoplasms: mortality /
Pancreatic Neoplasms: pathology / Pancreatic Neoplasms: drug
therapy / Etodolac: therapeutic use / Drug Repositioning /
Aged / Propranolol: therapeutic use /
Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors:
therapeutic use / Adrenergic beta-Antagonists: therapeutic
use / Perioperative Care: methods / Betablockade (Other) /
COX-2-inhibition (Other) / Inflammation (Other) / Pancreatic
cancer (Other) / Perioperative period (Other) / Etodolac
(NLM Chemicals) / Propranolol (NLM Chemicals) /
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors (NLM Chemicals) / Adrenergic
beta-Antagonists (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {D196},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)D196-20160331},
pnm = {314 - Immunologie und Krebs (POF4-314)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-314},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40402347},
doi = {10.1007/s00423-025-03735-3},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/301547},
}