001     301922
005     20250615021103.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105293
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:40494040
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:177955286
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-01192
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Vancoppenolle, J.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Financial toxicity and socioeconomic impact of cancer in Europe.
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2025
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1749647425_18023
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Even with universal health care, patients living with cancer often face substantial treatment-related costs and income loss in Europe. Insights into the socioeconomic impact of cancer within and across countries are needed to create awareness, inform policy, and develop targeted measurement instruments. The SEC study aims to explore the socioeconomic impact and financial toxicity of cancer and identify vulnerable patient groups across Europe.To investigate experiences of a large number of patients, data were collected in a collaborative effort of hospitals and patient organizations across Europe through convenience sampling. Patients undergoing treatment currently or treated within the past 2 years could participate. A 44-item survey was developed to measure the socioeconomic impact following a cancer diagnosis. The primary outcome was the level of financial toxicity, measured by the Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT) score. To identify vulnerable groups, multiple regression analyses were used to investigate the association between the FIT score, clinical characteristics, and socioeconomic demographics, including cancer type, employment status, and country of residence.A total of 2507 patients across Europe met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-six percent of the patients reported income loss and 86% additional treatment-related expenses. Sixteen percent of patients delayed or avoided medical visits, buying medication, surgery, or other health services. Next to a significant association of the country of residence, our regression models demonstrated that divorced, self-employed patients who were younger (-0.02; P = 0.000) and lower educated (0.75; P = 0.000) with a lower household income (1.21; P = 0.000) and children (0.21; P = 0.000) at the time of diagnosis reported significantly higher FIT scores compared with older patients who were married (-0.56; P = 0.000), retired (-1.55; P = 0.000), or employed (-0.56; P = 0.000).In every European Union country, a substantial number of patients with cancer report serious financial consequences and stress. Further research is critical to inform well-tailored policies and interventions to limit the socioeconomic impact on patients with cancer.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Europe
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a financial toxicity
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a income loss
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a non-treatment adherence
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a oncology
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a socioeconomic impact
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Franzen, N.
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Azarang, L.
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Juslin, T.
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Krini, M.
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Lubbers, T.
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Mattson, J.
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Mayeur, D.
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Menezes, R.
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Schmitt, J.
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Scotte, F.
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Seoane López, O.
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Skaali, T.
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Ubels, J.
|0 P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0
|b 13
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Schlander, M.
|0 P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf
|b 14
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Retel, V.
|b 15
700 1 _ |a van Harten, W. H.
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Economics, OECI Working Group Health
|b 17
|e Collaboration Author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105293
|g Vol. 10, no. 6, p. 105293 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2844985-X
|n 6
|p 105293
|t ESMO open
|v 10
|y 2025
|x 2059-7029
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:301922
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 13
|6 P:(DE-He78)7586e13ade56c5b4d4cba2fc411b0cf0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 14
|6 P:(DE-He78)1f315d09721b91091df1ba78eb65cbaf
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ESMO OPEN : 2022
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-04-12T14:49:18Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-04-12T14:49:18Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-04-12T14:49:18Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ESMO OPEN : 2022
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-30
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-30
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
|k C100
|l Gesundheitsökonomie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C100-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21