% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hubertus:302042,
author = {V. Hubertus and L. Viezens and M. Stangenberg and A. M.
Früh and H. S. Meyer and R. Liang and A. Kramer and C.
Orban and J. Kerschbaumer and B. Kunze and S. Telera and H.
Miller and C. J. Entenmann and E. J. von Bronewski and C.
Buhre and L.-G. Leonhardt and W. Willenbacher and I.
Kvitsaridze and D. Laue and M. Pumberger and T. Keller and
G. Acker and J. Krönke and I.-W. Blau and U. Keller and F.
Ringel and C. Thomé and B. Meyer and P. Vajkoczy and M.
Dreimann and J. S. Onken$^*$},
title = {{P}ractice variations in indication, timing and outcome of
{M}ultiple {M}yeloma patients undergoing surgery for
vertebral lesions - results from the {E}uropean {M}2{S}pine
study group.},
journal = {Journal of neuro-oncology},
volume = {174},
number = {3},
issn = {0167-594X},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01233},
pages = {765-777},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Sep;174(3):765-777},
abstract = {Painful vertebral lesions are pathognomonic in Multiple
Myeloma (MM). While non-surgical management is generally
preferred, some patients ultimately require surgical
intervention. Here we describe the largest European cohort
of MM patients with vertebral lesions to examine the
practice variations of spine surgery in means of indication,
timing and outcome.This study included patients with MM
vertebral lesions enrolled in the European M2Spine Registry
(DRKS00033326) at seven European academic spine centers
between 2005 and 2023. Retrospective analysis evaluated
epidemiological, clinical, and oncological treatment,
focused on surgical management. Uni- and multivariate
analyses identified factors associated with a decision
towards spine surgery, including transitions from initially
intended non-surgical approaches.704 patients were enrolled
and 493 $(70\%)$ surgically treated. Main indications for
surgery were refractory vertebral pain $(41\%)$ and
neurological deficits $(22\%).$ Radiological and clinical
parameters indicating spinal instability as assessed
retrospectively were present in $32\%$ but associated with
surgical management in only $43\%.$ 338 patients $(48\%)$
underwent surgery during early disease stage, while 110
$(16\%)$ received delayed surgery (median: 42 months, range:
12-306 months). Statistical analysis revealed lower MM
grading (ISS) at diagnosis (p < 0.001), and a new onset of
neurological deficits (p < 0.001) as the most significant
indicators for a cross-over from intended non-surgical to
surgical treatment. Of the $78\%$ of patients available for
neurological follow up, $94\%$ of surgically treated
patients showed an improved or stable neurological status
after a median of 45 months.Surgical intervention proved to
be a viable option for patients with refractory pain and
neurological deficits. Data from future prospective studies
are necessary to evaluate the clinical trajectory of
surgical and non-surgical treatment, and to ultimately
provide evidence-based surgical treatment guidelines for MM
patients.},
keywords = {Chronic vertebral pain (Other) / Multiple myeloma (Other) /
Surgical complications (Other) / Surgical decision-making
(Other) / Vertebral column lesions (Other)},
cin = {BE01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40512280},
doi = {10.1007/s11060-025-05085-y},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/302042},
}