% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wankhede:302850,
author = {D. Wankhede$^*$ and N. Halama$^*$ and M. Kloor$^*$ and H.
Brenner$^*$ and M. Hoffmeister$^*$},
title = {{D}iabetes and {C}olorectal {C}ancer {R}isk and {S}urvival
{A}ccording to {T}umor {I}mmunity {S}tatus.},
journal = {Journal of clinical oncology},
volume = {43},
number = {26},
issn = {0732-183X},
address = {Alexandria, Va.},
publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01390},
pages = {2930-2941},
year = {2025},
note = {#EA:C070#LA:C070# / 2025 Sep 10;43(26):2930-2941 / vormals
D240},
abstract = {Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with an increased
risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and poorer survival
outcomes. However, the role of tumor immune status in
influencing these relationships remains unclear.We conducted
a population-based matched case-control study (n = 4,724)
with prospective long-term follow-up of CRC cases (n =
2,321; median follow-up, 9.5 years). Tumor immune status was
assessed using an immune cell score (ICS), derived from CD3+
and CD8+ T-cell densities measured at the invasive margin
and tumor core of resected specimens. ICS was stratified
into high (ICSHi), intermediate (ICSInt), and low (ICSLow)
immune infiltration on the basis of standard cutoffs $(25\%$
and $70\%).$ Multivariable logistic regression estimated CRC
risk, whereas time-dependent Cox regression evaluated
survival outcomes. Primary end points included CRC-specific
survival and disease-free survival (DFS).The association
between T2D and CRC risk differed significantly by ICS (P
for heterogeneity = .02). T2D was associated with an
increased risk of CRC (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 $[95\%$ CI,
1.17 to 1.66]), particularly for ICSLow (OR, 1.80 $[95\%$
CI, 1.35 to 2.39]) and ICSInt subtypes (OR, 1.42 $[95\%$ CI,
1.17 to 1.66]), but not for ICSHi CRC subtype (OR, 1.16
$[95\%$ CI, 0.88 to 1.52]). Patients with T2D with ICSLow
tumors showed poorer CRC-specific survival (hazard ratio
[HR], 1.99 $[95\%$ CI, 1.30 to 3.05]) and DFS (HR, 1.53
$[95\%$ CI, 1.05 to 2.26]) than those without T2D, but not
for ICSInt and ICSHi CRC subtypes. Patients with T2D showed
inferior overall and non-cancer-related survival regardless
of immune subtypes.T2D disproportionately affects CRC risk
and survival in tumors with low immune infiltration,
suggesting a continuum of T2D's impact from tumorigenesis to
prognosis, through systemic and tumor-specific immune
modulation. These findings highlight the need for precision
prevention strategies integrating metabolic and immune-based
interventions to mitigate CRC burden in patients with T2D.},
cin = {C070 / D196 / D470 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)D196-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)D470-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40658916},
doi = {10.1200/JCO-25-00148},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/302850},
}