% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Btof:302862,
author = {R. Bütof and L. Koi and S. Löck$^*$ and S. Appold and S.
Drewes and D. Koschel and J. Kotzerke and U. Nestle and S.
Adebahr and D. Zips and F. Heinzelmann and T. Hehr and D.
Bucher and J. Heide and C. Belka and F. Manapov and E.
Wasilewska-Tesluk and J. Fleckenstein and M. Krause$^*$ and
E. Troost$^*$ and M. Baumann$^*$},
title = {{A}ccelerated vs. conventionally fractionated postoperative
radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer-final results of
the prematurely terminated {PORTAF} trial.},
journal = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie},
volume = {nn},
issn = {0179-7158},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer Medizin},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01402},
pages = {nn},
year = {2025},
note = {#LA:E220# / epub},
abstract = {A prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) has been
demonstrated to adversely affect the primary radiation
therapy (RT) outcome in various solid tumors, including
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Retrospective data from
our group suggested an advantage of shorter OTT also for
postoperative RT (PORT) in patients with NSCLC. The PORTAF
trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02189967) was initiated to
prospectively test this hypothesis.The multicenter
prospective randomized phase II trial in patients with NSCLC
investigated whether an accelerated schedule of PORT (7
fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 3.5-4 weeks)
improved outcome compared to conventional fractionation (5
fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 5-6 weeks).
Target volumes and total radiation doses were stratified in
both treatment arms based on individual risk factors.
Primary endpoint of the study was locoregional tumor control
(LRTC) 36 months after PORT, with 154 patients to be
included in each arm.Due to slow accrual and changed
indications for PORT, we prematurely closed the trial in
2019. Between 2014 and 2019, eight recruiting centers
included 27 evaluable patients. An interim safety analysis
performed for the first 21 patients showed nonsignificant
differences regarding grade 3 toxicities between the
treatment arms, thus not meeting the termination criteria.
LRTC was not significantly different between accelerated
$(73\%)$ and conventionally fractionated RT $(92\%;$ p =
0.535). Noteworthily, in 21 FDG-PET/CT restagings before RT,
an unexpectedly high number of locoregional recurrences (n =
4) and distant metastases (n = 2) were seen, resulting in
changed treatment intentions for these patients.The
prematurely closed PORTAF trial did not find significant
differences in 3‑year LRTC when comparing accelerated
versus conventionally fractionated irradiation. The observed
additional benefit of FDG-PET/CT restaging prior to PORT
should be further investigated in a larger cohort to
optimize patient selection and avoid unnecessary
side-effects.},
keywords = {Fractionation (Other) / Non-small-cell lung cancer (Other)
/ Overall treatment time (Other) / Positron-emission
tomography (Other) / Postoperative radiotherapy (Other)},
cin = {DD01 / E220},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E220-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40663146},
doi = {10.1007/s00066-025-02422-y},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/302862},
}