% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Blobner:303080,
author = {J. Blobner and V. Ruf and J. Weller and N. Teske and R.
Forbrig and N. Thon and N. L. Albert and L. von
Baumgarten$^*$ and S. Schoenecker and J.-C. Tonn and F.
Ringel and P. Harter$^*$ and P. Karschnia},
title = {{C}linical and neuropathological criteria for
distinguishing between {IDH}-mutant astrocytomas of {WHO}
grade 2 and 3.},
journal = {Journal of neuro-oncology},
volume = {175},
number = {2},
issn = {0167-594X},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01505},
pages = {763-774},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Nov;175(2):763-774},
abstract = {The 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors allows
flexibility in the grading of IDH-mutant astrocytic gliomas,
leading to some ambiguity. Following the approval of
vorasidenib for WHO grade 2 astrocytomas and
oligodendrogliomas based on the positive Phase III INDIGO
trial, identifying prognostic criteria to differentiate
between grade 2 and grade 3 tumors has become increasingly
important.We retrospectively searched our institutional
database for patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for
IDH-mutant astrocytomas (grade 2 and 3) according to the WHO
2021 classification. Clinical, radiological and molecular
data were collected; outcome was compared using log-rank
analysis and prognostic markers were subsequently forwarded
in a multivariate model.We identified 91 patients with
IDH-mutant astrocytomas with available neuropathological and
clinical data, including 61 WHO grade 2 $(67.0\%)$ and 30
WHO grade 3 $(33.0\%)$ tumors. At a median follow-up of 89
months, median progression-free survival was 67 months for
WHO grade 2 and 53 months for WHO grade 3 tumors. Median
overall survival was 216 months for WHO grade 3 tumors,
while it was not reached for WHO grade 2 tumors. Univariate
analysis showed that higher WHO grade, increased mitotic
count, elevated Ki67 indices and preoperative contrast
enhancement were associated with poorer outcomes; however,
only contrast enhancement retained prognostic significance
on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03 for overall survival, p =
0.02 for progression-free survival).While our findings await
confirmation in larger prospective cohorts,
neuropathological grading criteria might need to be
accompanied by clinical information including contrast
enhancement to prognostically distinguish grade 2 from grade
3 tumors.},
keywords = {Astrocytoma (Other) / Contrast-enhancement (Other) /
Grading (Other) / IDH-inhibitor (Other) / IDH-mutant (Other)
/ Mitotic count (Other)},
cin = {MU01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40702387},
doi = {10.1007/s11060-025-05173-z},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/303080},
}