Home > Publications database > Anatomical outcome after brachytherapy with bi-nuclide (Ru-106/Iodine-125) plaques in large uveal melanomas. > print |
001 | 303370 | ||
005 | 20250806114414.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1186/s13014-025-02707-7 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:40745612 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC12315396 |2 pmc |
037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2025-01619 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Jabbarli, Leyla |0 0000-0001-7370-5077 |b 0 |
245 | _ | _ | |a Anatomical outcome after brachytherapy with bi-nuclide (Ru-106/Iodine-125) plaques in large uveal melanomas. |
260 | _ | _ | |a London |c 2025 |b BioMed Central |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1754393742_8393 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Proprietary bi-nuclide plaques combine the radiation properties of beta and gamma brachytherapy and can irradiate a larger target volume compared to ruthenium-plaques. While reducing the dose to structures outside the target volume, brachytherapy with bi-nuclide-plaques (BBNP) delivers a higher target dose compared to iodine-plaques. We aimed at analyzing the local tumor control and eye retention probability after BBNP.All consecutive cases with large uveal melanoma (tumor thickness ≥ 7 mm) treated with BBNP at our institution between 01/1999 and 12/2020 were included (n = 576, median follow-up: 30.8 months [interquartile range, IQR: 12.9-57.4]). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.Secondary enucleation (SE) was performed in 13.5% of cases (n = 78) after the median of 20.0 months (IQR: 9.0-34.7) post-BBNP. The overall rate of local tumor recurrence (LR) in the cohort was 8.5% (n = 49) and was diagnosed at the median post-BBNP interval of 20.0 months (IQR: 15.6-35.2). Of the patients' baseline characteristics, higher age (> 67 years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.80, p = 0.011), tumor thickness (> 8.5 mm, aHR = 2.20, p = 0.002), visual acuity (> 0.5 logMAR, aHR = 1.83, p = 0.009), and sclera dose (> 1000 Gy, aHR = 1.65, p = 0.034) were independently associated with the risk of SE. In turn, higher age (> 67 years, aHR = 1.93, p = 0.023), tumor thickness (> 8.5 mm, aHR = 2.02, p = 0.020), and visual acuity (> 0.5 logMAR, aHR = 2.27, p = 0.005) were independently related to LR.BBNP facilitates eye retention in 86.5% of patients with large uveal melanoma 2.5 years after treatment. Patients' baseline, tumor and treatment characteristics were strongly associated with the risk of SE and LR after BBNP. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899 |c POF4-899 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Bi-nuclide plaque |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Brachytherapy |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Enucleation |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Local recurrence |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Risk factors |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Uveal melanoma |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Iodine Radioisotopes |2 NLM Chemicals |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Ruthenium Radioisotopes |2 NLM Chemicals |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Iodine-125 |0 GVO776611R |2 NLM Chemicals |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Ruthenium-106 |2 NLM Chemicals |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Humans |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Brachytherapy: methods |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Uveal Neoplasms: radiotherapy |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Uveal Neoplasms: pathology |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Melanoma: radiotherapy |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Melanoma: pathology |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Male |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Iodine Radioisotopes: therapeutic use |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Uveal Melanoma |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Female |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Middle Aged |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Ruthenium Radioisotopes: therapeutic use |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Aged |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Retrospective Studies |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Adult |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Follow-Up Studies |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Aged, 80 and over |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Neoplasm Recurrence, Local: pathology |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Radiotherapy Dosage |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Prognosis |2 MeSH |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Fiorentzis, Miltiadis |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Guberina, Maja |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Schmidt, Boerge |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Rating, Philipp |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Biewald, Eva |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Guberina, Nika |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Flühs, Dirk |b 7 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Bornfeld, Norbert |b 8 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Sauerwein, Wolfgang |b 9 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Stuschke, Martin |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 10 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Bechrakis, Nikolaos E |b 11 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1186/s13014-025-02707-7 |g Vol. 20, no. 1, p. 119 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2224965-5 |n 1 |p 119 |t Radiation oncology |v 20 |y 2025 |x 1748-717X |
909 | C | O | |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:303370 |p VDB |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 10 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Programmungebundene Forschung |l ohne Programm |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v ohne Topic |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2025 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b RADIAT ONCOL : 2022 |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2024-04-10T15:44:48Z |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2024-04-10T15:44:48Z |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review |d 2024-04-10T15:44:48Z |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-18 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-18 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331 |k ED01 |l DKTK Koordinierungsstelle Essen/Düsseldorf |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|