% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schmitz:303495,
author = {D. Schmitz and S. Prax and M. Kliment and F. Gocke and D.
Kazdal and M. Allgäuer and R. Penzel and M. Kirchner and O.
Neumann and H. Sültmann$^*$ and J. Budczies and P.
Schirmacher$^*$ and F. Bergmann and J.-P. Ritz and R. Hinze
and F. Grassmann and J. Rudi and A. Stenzinger and A.-L.
Volckmar},
title = {{D}ifferentiating {M}ain-{D}uct {IPMN} from {C}hronic
{P}ancreatitis {U}sing {N}ext-{G}eneration {S}equencing of
{M}ain {P}ancreatic {D}uct {F}luid: {A} {P}ilot {S}tudy.},
journal = {Diagnostics},
volume = {15},
number = {15},
issn = {2075-4418},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01686},
pages = {1964},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Background: A dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥ 5 mm
can be observed in main-duct IPMNs (MD-IPMN) and chronic
pancreatitis (CP); however, distinguishing between the two
differently treated diseases can be difficult. Cell-free
(cf) DNA in MPD fluid obtained by EUS-guided FNA might help
to distinguish MD-IPMN from CP. Methods: All patients with a
dilated MPD ≥ 5 mm on EUS during the period of 1 June 2017
to 30 April 2024 were prospectively analysed in this
single-centre study, with EUS-guided MPD fluid aspiration
performed for suspected MD-IPMN or CP in patients who were
suitable for surgery. Twenty-two known gastrointestinal
cancer genes, including GNAS and KRAS, were analysed by deep
targeted (dt) NGS. The results were correlated with resected
tissue, biopsy, and long-term follow-up. Results: A total of
164 patients with a dilated MPD were identified, of which 30
$(18.3\%)$ underwent EUS-guided FNA, with 1 patient having a
minor complication $(3.3\%).$ Twenty-two patients (mean MPD
diameter of 12.4 (7-31) mm) with a definitive, mostly
surgically confirmed diagnosis were included in the
analysis. Only a fish-mouth papilla, which was present in 3
of 12 $(25\%)$ MD-IPMNs, could reliably differentiate
between the two diseases, with history, symptoms, diffuse or
segmental MPD dilation, presence of calcifications on
imaging, cytology, and CEA in the ductal fluid failing to
achieve differentiation. However, GNAS mutations were found
exclusively in 11 of the 12 $(91.6\%)$ patients with MD-IPMN
(p < 0.01), whereas KRAS mutations were identified in both
diseases. Conclusions: GNAS testing by dtNGS in aspirated
fluid from dilated MPD obtained by EUS-guided FNA may help
differentiate MD-IPMN from CP for surgical resection.},
keywords = {chronic (Other) / endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle
aspiration (Other) / high-throughput nucleotide sequencing
(Other) / intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (Other) /
pancreatitis (Other) / prospective study (Other)},
cin = {B063},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B063-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40804928},
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics15151964},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/303495},
}