% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Xie:303503,
author = {R. Xie$^*$ and S. Sha$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$ and B.
Schöttker$^*$},
title = {{C}irculating inflammation-related proteome improves
cardiovascular risk prediction. {R}esults from two large
{E}uropean cohort studies.},
journal = {European journal of epidemiology},
volume = {nn},
issn = {0393-2990},
address = {[Cham]},
publisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland AG},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01694},
pages = {nn},
year = {2025},
note = {#EA:C070#LA:C070# / epub},
abstract = {Inflammation plays a crucial role in cardiovascular disease
(CVD), but the value of inflammation-related proteins in
predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is
unclear. This study evaluated whether incorporating
inflammation-related proteins into the SCORE2 model improves
10-year MACE risk prediction.This study included 47,382
participants from the UK Biobank and 4,135 participants from
the German ESTHER study without prior CVD or diabetes. We
tested C-reactive protein (CRP) and 73 inflammation-related
proteins measured with Olink® panels. Biomarker selection
was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection
operator (LASSO) regression with bootstrapping separately
for males and females. Selected proteins were added to the
SCORE2 model variables. Model performance was evaluated
using Harrell's C-index, net reclassification index (NRI),
and integrated discrimination index (IDI).Seven
inflammation-related proteins but not CRP were selected,
including two for both sexes, three specifically for males,
and two specifically for females. Incorporating these
proteins significantly improved the C-index $(95\%$
confidence interval $(95\%CI))$ of the refitted SCORE2 model
from 0.716 (0.698, 0.734) to 0.750 (0.732, 0.768) in
internal validation in the UK Biobank and from 0.677 (0.644,
0.710) to 0.713 (0.681, 0.745) in external validation in the
ESTHER study. The NRI with $95\%CI$ was $12.4\%$ $(5.2\%,$
$16.3\%)$ in internal validation and $4.2\%$ $(0.5\%,$
$23.6\%)$ in external validation. The IDI also improved
significantly.Incorporating inflammation-related proteins
into the SCORE2 model significantly improves the prediction
of 10-year MACE risk among individuals without prior CVD or
diabetes. Measuring these proteins may enhance risk
stratification in clinical practice.},
keywords = {Cardiovascular disease (Other) / Inflammation (Other) /
Proteins (Other) / Proteomics (Other) / Risk prediction
(Other)},
cin = {C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40801988},
doi = {10.1007/s10654-025-01285-y},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/303503},
}