% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Supke:303506,
author = {M. Supke and S. K. Schäfer and J. Meier and H. T. Hamada
and M. Yamada and M. Wessa$^*$ and K. Lieb},
title = {{P}ositive mental states and their relation to psychosocial
resources: protocol of a systematic review focusing on
cultural moderators.},
journal = {BMJ open},
volume = {15},
number = {8},
issn = {2044-6055},
address = {London},
publisher = {BMJ Publishing Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01696},
pages = {e103821},
year = {2025},
note = {Protocoll of a systematic review},
abstract = {Fostering well-being and positive mental states are major
aims of many strategies for the promotion of public mental
health. Such strategies become increasingly important since
many people worldwide suffer from psychological distress and
mental disorders, resulting in substantial individual and
societal costs. Within the last years, there is a shift from
strategies solely focusing on the reduction of mental
distress to those also aiming at the promotion of positive
mental states. Correlates, that is, psychosocial resources,
of positive mental states may represent a starting point for
those interventions. To date, a comprehensive systematic
review on those correlates is still missing as well as
knowledge on culture-related differences.A systematic review
and meta-analysis on the longitudinal link between
psychosocial resources (eg, income, optimism, social support
and community coherence) and hedonic and eudaimonic positive
mental states (eg, life satisfaction, happiness and
forward-looking attitude) will be conducted. Using
Hofstede's dimensions of culture and global metrics of
Education, Industrialisation, Richness and Democratic values
(EIRDness), we will examine culture-related moderators of
these associations. The systematic review will be conducted
following standards of the Cochrane Collaboration and will
be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyse guidelines.
Literature searches for primary studies will be carried out
across four databases (APA PsycNet, Embase, Scopus and the
Web of Science Core Collection), including all publications
up to 27 January 2025. Screening at the level of titles and
abstracts will be performed with the help of artificial
intelligence software (ASReview). Study quality will be
assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle Ottawa
Scale. We will employ multilevel meta-analyses of
correlation coefficients, with cultural variables being
examined as moderators.This systematic review does not
require ethics approval, as it solely uses previously
published data. Materials and data used for this review will
be shared via open repositories (https://osf.io/2xkhs/).
Results will be published in an international, peer-reviewed
journal and presented at conferences including plain
language summaries. OSF REGISTRATION DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K7X52.},
keywords = {MENTAL HEALTH (Other) / Meta-Analysis (Other) / Quality of
Life (Other) / Systematic Review (Other)},
cin = {C160},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C160-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40812806},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103821},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/303506},
}