% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ballhausen:304245,
author = {A. Ballhausen and F. Morano and A. Stahler and S. Lonardi
and A. J. Kind and C. Cremolini and S. Swoboda and G. Randon
and D. Horst and M. Prisciandaro and A. H. S. Alig and C. C.
Pircher and A. Jarosch and P. Andena and A. Kurreck and A.
A. Chiaramonte and S. Stintzing$^*$ and F. Pietrantonio and
D. P. Modest$^*$ and A. Raimondi},
title = {{P}rimary tumor sidedness and negative hyperselection to
modulate anti-{EGFR}-based maintenance strategies in
patients with {RAS} wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer:
individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomized
clinical trials.},
journal = {British journal of cancer},
volume = {133},
number = {9},
issn = {0007-0920},
address = {Edinburgh},
publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01799},
pages = {1297-1306},
year = {2025},
note = {2025 Nov;133(9):1297-1306},
abstract = {Patients with RAS wild-type (WT), left-sided metastatic
colorectal cancer (mCRC), negatively hyperselected for
anti-EGFR resistance alterations, benefit most from
anti-EGFR-based first-line treatment. The predictive impact
of these stratification parameters on maintenance strategy
efficacy is unclear.This pooled analysis included individual
patient data from the PanaMa (NCT01991873) and Valentino
(NCT02476045) phase 2 trials. Patients with RAS WT mCRC
received FOLFOX plus Panitumumab induction therapy followed
by maintenance with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus
Panitumumab vs. 5-FU/LV monotherapy (PanaMa) or Panitumumab
monotherapy (Valentino). Outcomes included progression-free
survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses
examined primary tumor sidedness (left vs. right) and
hyperselection status (negative vs. altered).Among 607
patients receiving induction, sidedness and hyperselection
status were available for 589 and 511 patients,
respectively. Left-sided and negative hyperselected tumors
were observed in $80.2\%$ and $63.9\%$ of patients,
respectively. Panitumumab-based maintenance improved PFS in
left-sided, negative hyperselected patients compared to
5-FU/LV alone, with no OS differences. PFS and OS were
comparable for Panitumumab alone vs. Panitumumab plus
5-FU/LV.Tumor sidedness and hyperselection status
significantly influence maintenance strategy efficacy in
mCRC. For left-sided, negative hyperselected patients,
Panitumumab monotherapy may optimize efficacy while
minimizing toxicity. Further investigation into the relative
contribution of individual hyperselection parameters in this
setting is warranted.},
cin = {BE01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40877636},
doi = {10.1038/s41416-025-03164-5},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/304245},
}