% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hu:304293,
author = {Y. Hu$^*$ and E. Kharazmi and Q. Liang$^*$ and H.
Brenner$^*$ and J. Sundquist and K. Sundquist and M.
Fallah$^*$},
title = {{R}isk of colorectal cancer by family history of both
colorectal carcinomas and colorectal polyps: a nationwide
cohort study.},
journal = {Cancer communications},
volume = {nn},
issn = {1000-467X},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-01829},
pages = {nn},
year = {2025},
note = {#EA:C120#LA:C120# / epub},
abstract = {The increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) associated
with family history of both colorectal in situ or invasive
carcinomas (Stage 0 to IV) and colorectal polyps is
attributed solely to family history of CRC, resulting in an
underestimation of the actual risk. We aimed to assess the
association between overall and early-onset CRC (EOCRC) risk
and family history of both colorectal carcinomas and
polyps.We conducted a nationwide cohort study leveraging
Swedish family-cancer datasets with follow-up from 1964 to
2018. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated
to estimate the risk of CRC and EOCRC among individuals with
a family history of both colorectal polyps and carcinomas.We
followed up 13,432,205 individuals for up to 54 years. The
risk of overall CRC was 2.2 times increased in individuals
with 1 first-degree relative (FDR) with one-time polyp
diagnosis and an additional FDR with carcinoma $(95\%$ CI =
2.1-2.3; EOCRC SIR = 2.9 $[95\%$ CI = 2.4-3.4]). The risk
was significantly higher in individuals with 1 FDR with
repeated polyp diagnoses (≥2 times) and an additional FDR
with carcinoma (overall SIR = 2.9 $[95\%$ CI = 2.7-3.1];
EOCRC SIR = 5.4 $[95\%$ CI = 3.9-6.4]). A similar risk was
observed in individuals with ≥2 FDRs with one-time polyp
diagnosis and an additional FDR with carcinoma (overall SIR
= 2.9 $[95\%$ CI = 2.4-3.4]; EOCRC SIR = 5.3 $[95\%$ CI =
3.0-8.6]). Individuals with ≥2 FDRs with repeated polyp
diagnoses and an additional FDR with carcinoma had a
5.0-fold overall risk $(95\%$ CI = 4.3-5.7) and a 13.8-fold
EOCRC risk $(95\%$ CI = 9.7-20.1). Younger age at
polyp/carcinoma diagnoses, and more relatives with polyps
and carcinomas were associated with higher CRC
risk.Individuals with a family history of both colorectal
polyps and carcinomas are at significantly increased risk of
CRC, especially EOCRC. The risk increased with frequent
polyp diagnoses, younger age at first polyp/carcinoma
diagnoses, and the number of relatives with
polyps/carcinomas. This study highlights the importance of
considering both colorectal polyps and carcinomas in family
history when assessing CRC risk. These findings could
supplement current screening guidelines.},
keywords = {colorectal cancer (Other) / colorectal polyp (Other) /
early‐onset colorectal cancer (Other) / family history
(Other)},
cin = {C120 / C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40898381},
doi = {10.1002/cac2.70059},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/304293},
}