000304487 001__ 304487
000304487 005__ 20250911114928.0
000304487 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1055/a-2654-5683
000304487 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:40921164
000304487 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0937-2032
000304487 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0173-7937
000304487 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1439-1058
000304487 037__ $$aDKFZ-2025-01879
000304487 041__ $$aGerman
000304487 082__ $$a150
000304487 1001_ $$aKuhnt, Susanne$$b0
000304487 245__ $$aHow do employees of cancer counseling centers and their providers evaluate the funding of outpatient cancer counseling centers by health insurance funds – A qualitative interview study. [Wie bewerten Mitarbeiter:innen von Krebsberatungsstellen und deren Träger die Förderung ambulanter Krebsberatungsstellen durch Krankenkassen – Eine qualitative Interviewstudie (KEVA)].
000304487 260__ $$aStuttgart [u.a.]$$bThieme$$c2025
000304487 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000304487 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000304487 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1757570309_26504
000304487 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000304487 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000304487 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000304487 500__ $$aepub
000304487 520__ $$aSince 2020, cancer counselling centers (CCCs) have been eligible for funding from health insurance funds under the legal regulation on 'Outpatient Cancer Counseling' (§65e SGB V). This article investigates the rationale for or against applying for funding and evaluates the funding option from the perspective of staff members at both funded and non-funded CCCs, as well as sponsoring organizations. The aim is to analyse the practical feasibility of the financing model.We conducted a qualitative study using guided expert interviews with employees of CCCs and sponsoring organizations. The institutions for interview participation were selected from all existing CCCs and sponsoring organizations, taking into account factors such as size, region, and funding status of the CCC through a quota-based random selection process. The interviews were analyzed using content-structural evaluation methods according to Kuckartz.The analysis is based on statements from 44 expert interviews, including 17 funded CCCs, 9 non-funded CCCs, 6 CCCs with changing status, and 12 sponsoring organizations. The funding option was generally rated positively and recognized as a significant advancement for outpatient cancer counselling. With regard to the required minimum number of consultations, it should be noted that the majority of CCCs considered this to be achievable. However, certain structural aspects were criticized, particularly regarding the allocation process, funding stability, and the requirements of financial auditing. Issues such as the remaining uncertainty of stable financing, and the insufficient recognition of essential work areas, such as group services, were highlighted, as well as the inadequate consideration of differences in service mandates, especially for CCCs in rural areas.The partial funding of outpatient CCCs by health insurance funds is an important step towards stable financing and standardization in outpatient cancer counselling. Future amendments should aim to ensure long-term security and flexibility of funding options in order to maintain comprehensive, needs-based and quality-assured cancer counselling in Germany with a growing proportion of cancer survivors, a significant proportion of whom have psychosocial problems and need counselling.
000304487 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-319H$$a319H - Addenda (POF4-319H)$$cPOF4-319H$$fPOF IV$$x0
000304487 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000304487 7001_ $$00009-0006-8432-5217$$aKöditz, Anne-Kathrin$$b1
000304487 7001_ $$00000-0002-7980-484X$$aHeyne, Svenja$$b2
000304487 7001_ $$aGmeiner, Charlotte$$b3
000304487 7001_ $$aMahlberg, Maria$$b4
000304487 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)76dcc66f81ef265e1968a39c42318846$$aWeg-Remers, Susanne$$b5$$udkfz
000304487 7001_ $$00000-0002-6872-9805$$aMehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja$$b6
000304487 7001_ $$00000-0002-2374-3232$$aErnst, Jochen$$b7
000304487 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2056547-1$$a10.1055/a-2654-5683$$gp. a-2654-5683$$pnn$$tPsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie$$vnn$$x0937-2032$$y2025
000304487 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:304487$$pVDB
000304487 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)76dcc66f81ef265e1968a39c42318846$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b5$$kDKFZ
000304487 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-319H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vAddenda$$x0
000304487 9141_ $$y2025
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPSYCHOTHER PSYCH MED : 2022$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2024-12-12
000304487 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2024-12-12
000304487 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)M100-20160331$$kM100$$lM100 Krebsinformationsdienst KID$$x0
000304487 980__ $$ajournal
000304487 980__ $$aVDB
000304487 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)M100-20160331
000304487 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED