% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Seiler:305740,
author = {I. Seiler and S. Schäfer and C. von Wachter and P.
Balermpas and M. Slavik and P. Burkon and J. Meents and L.
Kästner and F. Lohaus$^*$ and J. Willner and A. S. Schunn
and S. Drabke and K. Klischies and O. Wittenstein and P.
Bank and R. Partl and J.-A. Müller and A. Gawish and A.
Grün and A. Baehr and M. Trommer and A. Glasmacher and T.
Mader and R. Holy and Y. Dzierma and F. Ehret$^*$ and A.
Rühle and M. Guckenberger and C. Moustakis and T. Brunner
and O. Blanck and J. Boda-Heggemann and N. H. Nicolay and F.
Nägler},
title = {{I}mpact of target volume and dose concepts on the outcomes
of prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body
radiotherapy for spinal metastases - a {E}uropean
multicenter cohort study.},
journal = {Radiotherapy and oncology},
volume = {214},
issn = {0167-8140},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-02363},
pages = {111276},
year = {2026},
note = {Volume 214, January 2026, 111276},
abstract = {The importance of metastasis-directed radiotherapy is
increasing in the management of oligometastatic prostate
cancer. We evaluated different target volume and dose
concepts for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of spine
bone metastases (BoM) from prostate cancer in a large
European cohort.Data of prostate cancer patients receiving
SBRT for spine BoM between 2010 and 2024 at 19 European
cancer centers were retrospectively collected. Treatment
volumes and dose concepts were analyzed regarding their
impact on overall survival (OS), freedom from local
recurrence (FFLR), biochemical recurrence-free survival
(BRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).With a median
follow-up of 25.1 months (range: 1.4-77.2), 213 patients
with 283 spine BoM were evaluated. 1-/3-year PFS with
simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) were 85.7 $\%/73.9$
$\%$ (BED4 [Biologically effective dose with α/β-ratio = 4
Gy] ≥ 100 Gy) and for non-SIB concepts 81.2 $\%/45.5$ $\%$
(BED4 ≥ 100 Gy), respectively. 1-/3-year BRFS for
SIB-treated BoM amounted to 81.7 $\%/68.4$ $\%$ (BED4 ≥
100 Gy) and for non-SIB 78.3 $\%/43.6$ $\%$ (BED4 ≥ 100
Gy). OS was not significantly different for the evaluated
dose and target volume concepts. For FFLR a significant
difference was observed favoring BED4 ≥ 100 Gy. In
multivariable analysis, following factors were positively
associated with both PFS and BRFS: BED4 for GTVmean dose and
SIB concept. Adverse events were very low, with fracture
rates of 2.2 $\%.This$ multicenter cohort analysis showed
that SBRT of spine BoM from prostate cancer is an effective
and well-tolerated treatment. Both BED and usage of a SIB
concept were associated with improved PFS and BRFS.
Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and
further standardize SBRT concepts.},
keywords = {Bone metastases (Other) / Dose concept (Other) /
Metastasis-Directed therapy (MDT) (Other) / Prostate cancer
(Other) / Spine metastases (Other) / Stereotactic
radiotherapy (Other) / Target concept (Other)},
cin = {DD01 / BE01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41213475},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111276},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/305740},
}