% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kunte:306345,
author = {S. C. Kunte and L. M. Unterrainer and S. Lindner and A.
Holzgreve and W. G. Kunz and M. Winkelmann and A. Nitschmann
and K. Jurkschat and C. Wängler and B. Wängler and R.
Schirrmacher and C. Belka$^*$ and N. Thon and C. Schichor
and P. Bartenstein and M. Unterrainer},
title = {{F}easibility of different meningioma delineation
approaches on [18{F}]{S}i{TATE} {PET}/{CT} imaging.},
journal = {Discover oncology},
volume = {16},
issn = {1868-8497},
address = {[New York]},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-02561},
pages = {2189},
year = {2025},
note = {Volume 16, article number 2189, (2025)},
abstract = {Background:Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET is
valuable for meningioma imaging due to high SSTR expression.
[18F]SiTATE, a novel tracer, is not only promising for
imaging neuroendocrine tumors but also for meningiomas.
Standardized delineation methods on [18F]SiTATE PET are
lacking. This study correlates CT-based volumes with
PET-based delineation approaches to identify a threshold for
standardized [18F]SiTATE PET volume
assessment.Methods:Patients with well-delineated,
extraosseous meningioma on CT (≥ 1mL) who underwent
[18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included. Volumes were assessed on
contrast-enhanced CT and correlated with PET-based
delineation approaches: (I) fixed SUV threshold, (II)
isocontour thresholding relative to SUVmax $(SUV\%),$ and
thresholds relative to (III) bone marrow (SUVBM), (IV)
parotid gland (SUVparotis) and (V) pituitary gland
(SUVsella).Results:19 meningiomas in 17 PET/CT scans (16
patients) were included. A fixed SUV of 4.0 (r = 0.783,
p < 0.001) showed good correlation with CT volumes
without skewed distribution on Bland-Altman-Plot analysis.
Using isocontour-based thresholds, $45\%$ SUVmax
(r = 0.496, p = 0.031) showed the highest
concordance. Best reference-based approaches were achieved
by $150\%$ SUVBM (r = 0.859, p < 0.001), $250\%$
SUVparotis (r = 0.460, p = 0.047) and $70\%$
SUVsella (r = 0.819, p < 0.001). However,
background-based approaches showed a trend towards
overestimation of PET-volumes in larger meningiomas as
assessed on Bland-Altman-Plot analyses. Uptake intensities
of reference tissues (SUVBM, SUVparotis and SUVsella) were
not inter-correlated (p > 0.05 each).Conclusion:A fixed
SUV threshold of 4.0 showed strong agreement with CT-based
volumes in well-delineated, extraosseous meningiomas which
offers a simple, clinically applicable method without
technical requirements. Reference tissue-based methods
showed similar correlations but tended to overestimate
volumes in larger lesions.},
keywords = {Delineation (Other) / Isocontour (Other) / Meningioma
(Other) / SSTR (Other) / SUV (Other) / [18F]SiTATE (Other)},
cin = {MU01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41258525},
doi = {10.1007/s12672-025-04079-6},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/306345},
}