%0 Journal Article
%A Alves, Natalia
%A Schuurmans, Megan
%A Rutkowski, Dawid
%A Saha, Anindo
%A Vendittelli, Pierpaolo
%A Obuchowski, Nancy
%A Liedenbaum, Marjolein H
%A Haldorsen, Ingfrid S
%A Molven, Anders
%A Yakar, Derya
%A Geerdink, Jeroen
%A van Koeverden, Sebastiaan
%A Riviere, Deniece M
%A Venderink, Wulphert
%A de Haas, Robbert
%A Kim, Namkug
%A Löhr, J-Matthias
%A Suman, Garima
%A Maier-Hein, Klaus H
%A Hahn, Horst K
%A Wang, Weichung
%A Yuille, Alan L
%A Kambadakone, Avinash
%A Fishman, Elliot K
%A Verbeke, Caroline
%A Litjens, Geert
%A Hermans, John J
%A Huisman, Henkjan
%T Artificial intelligence and radiologists in pancreatic cancer detection using standard of care CT scans (PANORAMA): an international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory, observational study.
%J The lancet / Oncology
%V 27
%N 1
%@ 1470-2045
%C London
%I The Lancet Publ. Group
%M DKFZ-2025-02600
%P 116-124
%D 2026
%Z 2026 Jan;27(1):116-124. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00567-4. Epub 2025 Nov 20
%X Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the worst prognosis among major cancer types, primarily due to late diagnosis on contrast-enhanced CT. Artificial intelligence (AI) can improve diagnostic performance, but robust benchmarks and reliable comparison to radiologists' performance are scarce. We established an open-source benchmark with the aim of investigating AI systems for PDAC detection on CT and compared them to radiologists' performance, at scale.In this international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory, observational study (PANORAMA), the AI system was trained and externally validated within an international benchmark, with a cohort of 2310 patients from four tertiary care centres in the Netherlands and the USA for training (n=2224) and tuning (n=86), and a sequestered cohort of 1130 patients from five tertiary care centres (the Netherlands, Sweden, and Norway) for testing. A multi-reader, multi-case observer study with 68 radiologists (40 centres, 12 countries; median 9·0 [IQR 6·0-14·5] years of experience) was conducted on a subset of 391 patients from the testing cohort. The reference standard was established with histopathology and at least 3 years of clinical follow-up. The primary endpoint was the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the AI system compared to that of radiologists at PDAC detection on CT. The study protocol and statistical plan were prespecified to test non-inferiority (considering a margin of 0·05), followed by superiority towards the AI system. This study is registered with Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10599559) and is complete.Of the 3440 (1511 [44
%F PUB:(DE-HGF)16
%9 Journal Article
%$ pmid:41275871
%R 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00567-4
%U https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/306535