000307282 001__ 307282
000307282 005__ 20251218120133.0
000307282 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1088/1361-6560/ae2db6
000307282 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:41401511
000307282 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0031-9155
000307282 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1361-6560
000307282 037__ $$aDKFZ-2025-02975
000307282 041__ $$aEnglish
000307282 082__ $$a530
000307282 1001_ $$00009-0001-2239-0121$$aPehlivan, Johanna$$b0
000307282 245__ $$aElectron spin resonance measurements of radiation-induced radicals under conventional and ultra-high dose rate electron irradiation.
000307282 260__ $$aBristol$$bIOP Publ.$$c2025
000307282 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000307282 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000307282 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1765982791_2398477
000307282 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000307282 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000307282 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000307282 500__ $$aepub
000307282 520__ $$aUltra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has been shown in preclinical studies to reduce normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumour control, a phenomenon referred to as the Flash effect. The radiochemical and biological mechanisms responsible for this effect remain unclear. This study investigates radical formation and oxygen depletion under UHDR and conventional dose rate (CDR) conditions to gain mechanistic insight.Radical formation was investigated using Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) spectroscopy with both spin trapping and spin probe techniques. Oxygen consumption was monitored continuously during irradiation to complement radical yield measurements. E3 medium containing either spin traps (DMPO, DEPMPO, BMPO) or spin probes (CMH, TMTH, CAT1H) was prepared under hypoxic, physioxic, and normoxic conditions. Irradiations were performed at the Electron Linac for beams with high Brilliance and low Emittance (ELBE) at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) with 30 MeV electrons across a broad range of dose rates (0.1 Gy/s -10 5 Gy/s). Spin probe measurements enabled consistent comparisons between CDR and UHDR, revealing a significant dependence of spin concentration on both oxygenation and dose rate. In contrast, spin trapping showed reduced radical yields with decreasing oxygen levels, but no significant dose-rate dependence. Direct comparisons between UHDR and CDR were limited by differences in the decay kinetics of the spin adducts. Oxygen measurements confirmed a reduced oxygen consumption at UHDR, with the extent of depletion strongly dependent on initial oxygen concentration. The results support the hypothesis that UHDR conditions promote radical-radical recombination, shifting the reaction equilibrium and reducing the pool of radicals available to react in the homogeneous chemical phase, particularly with oxygen. The combined application of ESR spin trapping, spin probes, and real-time oxygen measurements offers complementary insight into dose-rate-dependent radical processes.
000307282 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000307282 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000307282 650_7 $$2Other$$aElectron Spin Resonance (ESR)
000307282 650_7 $$2Other$$aFLASH effect
000307282 650_7 $$2Other$$aOxygen depletion
000307282 650_7 $$2Other$$aRadical-Radical Recombination
000307282 7001_ $$aBeyreuther, Elke$$b1
000307282 7001_ $$00000-0003-0707-0856$$aHorst, Felix$$b2
000307282 7001_ $$00000-0001-9260-8205$$aNasse, Michael Johannes$$b3
000307282 7001_ $$00000-0003-4128-5498$$aPawelke, Jörg$$b4
000307282 7001_ $$aLeichtle, Dieter$$b5
000307282 7001_ $$00000-0002-6056-9747$$aJaekel, Oliver$$b6
000307282 7001_ $$aHolzapfel, Bernhard$$b7
000307282 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473501-5$$a10.1088/1361-6560/ae2db6$$pnn$$tPhysics in medicine and biology$$vnn$$x0031-9155$$y2025
000307282 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:307282$$pVDB
000307282 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$60000-0002-6056-9747$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b6$$kDKFZ
000307282 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000307282 9141_ $$y2025
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium$$d2024-12-27$$wger
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPHYS MED BIOL : 2022$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2024-12-27
000307282 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2024-12-27
000307282 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331$$kE040$$lE040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie$$x0
000307282 980__ $$ajournal
000307282 980__ $$aVDB
000307282 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
000307282 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED