001     307385
005     20260218120819.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.12.018
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41422918
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0360-3016
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-355X
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-03029
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Fuchs, Frederik
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Multi-Institutional Analysis of MR-Guided Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2025
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1766416891_3634861
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a epub / Autoren checken
520 _ _ |a Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) is commonly delivered in multiple fractions, whereas single-fraction (SF) SABR remains uncommon. Magnetic resonance (MR) guided linacs provide superior soft-tissue contrast compared to cone-beam computed tomography on conventional linacs, online adaptive replanning, continuous intrafraction visualization, and automatically triggered beam delivery, potentially enabling safe and effective SF-SABR.We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with MR-guided SF-SABR on a 0.35 Tesla MR-linac at two centers in XXX and XXX (anonymized for review). Median SF-SABR doses were 28 Gy (range: 28-40 Gy) for liver lesions, 30 Gy (range: 28-34 Gy) for lung lesions, 25 Gy for adrenal gland lesions and lymph nodes, and 26 Gy (range: 25-26 Gy) for renal lesions. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity graded according to CTCAE v5.0.Between April 2020 and December 2024, 161 patients with 175 lesions underwent MR-guided SF-SABR. Lesion distribution was liver (48.0%), lung (42.9%), adrenal gland (4.3%), lymph nodes (3.4%), and kidney (1.9%). Median gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume were 2.4 cc (range: 0.2-83.3 cc) and 9.3 cc (range: 1.4-112.1 cc), respectively. At a median follow-up of 19.3 months, LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 99.1% and 93.6%, respectively. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 59.3% and 51.4%, while OS rates were 81.8% and 73.4%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with only one acute grade 3 toxicity reported and no acute grade 4-5 or late grade 3-5 toxicities. Colorectal primary tumors were associated with poorer LC (HR 0.226; p=0.023). Larger GTV independently correlated with reduced LC (HR 1.15; p=0.048) and OS (HR 1.05; p=0.001).MR-guided SF-SABR is feasible, safe, and effective across various tumor locations, providing favorable LC with minimal toxicity, warranting further prospective evaluation.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
700 1 _ |a Herrera, Roberto
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Kotecha, Rupesh
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Rubens, Muni
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Roy, Mukesh
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Mittauer, Kathryn E
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Mansoorian, Sina
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Kaiser, Adeel
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Kalman, Noah
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Gaasch, Aurelie
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Marschner, Sebastian N
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Bassiri, Nema
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Rogowski, Paul
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Eze, Chukwuka
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Belka, Claus
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Corradini, Stefanie
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Chuong, Michael D
|b 16
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.12.018
|g p. S0360301625066052
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1500486-7
|p nn
|t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
|v nn
|y 2025
|x 0360-3016
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307385/files/1-s2.0-S0360301625066052-main.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307385/files/1-s2.0-S0360301625066052-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:307385
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 14
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b INT J RADIAT ONCOL : 2022
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b INT J RADIAT ONCOL : 2022
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-31
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-31
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-31
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331
|k MU01
|l DKTK Koordinierungsstelle München
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21