% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Zaghla:307576,
author = {B. K. Q. Zaghla and Z. Safyürek and D. Gröger and S.
Mecklenbräuker and N.-S. Lingstädt and O. Popp and J.
Spengler and M. Haji and M. Montesion and L. A. Albacker and
P. Mertins and M. G. Klatt$^*$},
title = {{S}ystematic evaluation of neoepitope predictions
challenges clinically observed {T}-cell responses and their
impact on immune evasion.},
journal = {Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
issn = {2051-1426},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DKFZ-2026-00071},
pages = {e013271},
year = {2026},
note = {#DKTKZFB26#},
abstract = {Peptide presentation on human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) is
essential for initiating T-cell responses and all
consequences of this presentation including anticancer
immunity or immune escape. Many studies have relied on in
silico prediction tools rather than biological measurement
of HLA presentation to study these effects. To better assess
the frequency and consequences of neoantigen presentation,
we overexpressed 125 combinations of full-length neoantigens
and one HLA class I allele to experimentally validate
presentation of mutated and non-mutated HLA ligands through
HLA ligand isolation followed by tandem mass spectrometry. A
successful presentation was observed only in $22\%$ of
predicted cases with strong implications on previously
described downstream effects. For example, the association
of HLA loss of heterozygosity with predicted neoepitopes was
challenged for $58\%$ (73/125) of combinations. Furthermore,
when testing 51 sequences used for personalized messenger
RNA neoepitope vaccines, we observed that clinical responses
were independent of the presentation status of the
neoepitopes. Even a presumably neoepitope-specific and
strongly expanded T cell receptor clone from a neoantigen
vaccination study could not be linked to a successfully
presented neoepitope. Overall, these data highlight the
importance of validating the presentation of neoepitopes to
fully understand our interpretation of clinical
mutation-specific responses and their related effects,
including immune evasion.},
keywords = {Humans / Immune Evasion / T-Lymphocytes: immunology /
Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte: immunology / Antigens, Neoplasm:
immunology / Antigens, Neoplasm: genetics / Antigen
Presentation: immunology / HLA Antigens: immunology / HLA
Antigens: genetics / Cancer Vaccines: immunology /
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I: immunology /
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I: genetics / Human
leukocyte antigen - HLA (Other) / Immunotherapy (Other) / T
cell Receptor - TCR (Other) / Vaccine (Other) / Epitopes,
T-Lymphocyte (NLM Chemicals) / Antigens, Neoplasm (NLM
Chemicals) / HLA Antigens (NLM Chemicals) / Cancer Vaccines
(NLM Chemicals) / Histocompatibility Antigens Class I (NLM
Chemicals)},
cin = {BE01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41506790},
doi = {10.1136/jitc-2025-013271},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307576},
}