% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Duwe:309609,
author = {G. Duwe and K. Moench and V. Kauth and M. Angeloni and J.
Eckhoff and M. Görtz$^*$ and S. Hoefert and T. D. Kocar and
L. Kollitsch and S. Mehralivand and D. Mercier and J.
Rudolph and J. Rueckel and R. Schönhof and M. Sondermann
and C. von Klot and A. Zamzow and J. P. Struck and H.
Borgmann},
title = {{K}ünstliche {I}ntelligenz in chirurgischen {D}isziplinen:
{E}insatz, {N}utzen und {P}otenzial – ein
{D}elphi-{E}xpertenkonsensus.},
journal = {Die Urologie},
volume = {nn},
issn = {2731-7064},
address = {New York]},
publisher = {Springer Medizin},
reportid = {DKFZ-2026-00259},
pages = {nn},
year = {2026},
note = {epub},
abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI) in surgical disciplines has
the potential to support all areas of patient care, with the
goal of improving treatment quality and patient safety. A
group of multidisciplinary experts discussed the current
situation as well as steps required to successfully
integrate AI into surgical disciplines in the context of a
consensus conference at the second Digital Health Summit
(Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany) in August 2024.A
modified Delphi procedure was performed with 16
multidisciplinary physicians and scientists on the topic of
AI in surgical disciplines and beyond. In two online
meetings with subsequent Delphi survey rounds (LimeSurvey)
and a final hybrid meeting, individual statements were
contributed, discussed, and consented by all 16 participants
based on current national clinical guidelines.From a total
of 103 submitted statements, 36 statements on reality (n =
12), utopia (n = 13), and opportunities for digital
transformation (n = 11) were consented after discussion and
modification. We achieved a consensus of at least $75\%$ for
all the statements presented, with six of the statements
achieving a strong consensus of $100\%$ agreement.The
consensus statements show the great potential of AI for
improving patient care in surgical disciplines. Challenges
such as the lack of digitalization structures and legal
frameworks were identified, and practice-oriented proposals
for implementation were developed. The need for
multidisciplinary cooperation between medical professionals,
politics, and industry was emphasized in order to facilitate
the German healthcare system remaining competitive for the
future, both nationally and internationally.},
keywords = {Artificial intelligence (Other) / Delphi consensus
conference (Other) / Digitalization (Other) / Legal
framework (Other) / Surgery (Other)},
cin = {E250},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E250-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41615435},
doi = {10.1007/s00120-026-02778-8},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/309609},
}