% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Slesinski:309612,
author = {S. C. Slesinski and G. Bolte and S. Zhuang and T. Lakes and
E. Rehfuess and J. Staab and F. Bamberg and H. Baurecht and
H. Becher and H. Brenner$^*$ and N. Glaser and K. H.
Greiser$^*$ and K. Günther and V. Harth and J.-K. Heise and
T. Keil and C. J. Klett-Tammen and M. Leitzmann and W. Lieb
and C. Meinke-Franze and R. Mikolajczyk and I. Moreno
Velásquez and U. Mueller and R. Nagrani and N. Obi and C.
Övermöhle and T. Pischon and T. Schikowski and S. Schipf
and C. L. Schlett and B. Schmidt and M. B. Schulze and T.
Tönnies and S. N. Willich and A. Peters and A. Schneider
and K. Wolf},
title = {{T}ransportation noise and self-rated health: {E}vidence
from the {G}erman {N}ational {C}ohort ({NAKO}).},
journal = {Environmental research},
volume = {nn},
issn = {0013-9351},
address = {San Diego, Calif.},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2026-00262},
pages = {123885},
year = {2026},
abstract = {A large proportion of Europeans are exposed to high levels
of transportation noise, which can cause physiological and
psychological stress, leading to negative health impacts.
Few studies have examined the association between
transportation noise and self-rated health (SRH), a summary
indicator of morbidity.We aimed to assess the associations
of SRH with both annual average road traffic noise exposure
and nighttime transportation noise annoyance, examine
geographic differences, evaluate potential effect
modification and interaction by sex, and investigate whether
annoyance mediates the relationship between road traffic
noise and self-rated health.Using NAKO baseline data (n =
174,956), we implemented a cross-sectional study using
logistic regression to analyze associations of road traffic
noise ≥ 55 dB(A) and nighttime transportation noise
annoyance with poor SRH, adjusting for relevant
sociodemographic characteristics and environmental
co-exposures, including air pollution and greenness. We
examined geographic differences, tested for effect
modification by sex, and used path analysis to assess
mediation by annoyance.Road traffic noise ≥55 dB(A) (OR
1.06, $95\%$ CI 1.01-1.10), and moderate (OR 1.28,
1.23-1.32) and strong nighttime transportation noise
annoyance (OR 1.73, 1.65-1.81) were associated with higher
odds of poor SRH. Associations were similar for males and
females, but varied across study regions. The path analysis
revealed that road traffic noise was associated with higher
odds of poor SRH indirectly via nighttime transportation
noise annoyance (indirect effect).In our study, nighttime
transportation noise annoyance was more strongly and
consistently associated with poor SRH than road traffic
noise. Reducing both transportation noise and related
annoyance could help protect population health.},
keywords = {environmental noise exposure (Other) / mediation analysis
(Other) / noise annoyance (Other) / population-based cohort
(Other) / traffic noise (Other) / wellbeing (Other)},
cin = {C070 / C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41611060},
doi = {10.1016/j.envres.2026.123885},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/309612},
}