Home > Publications database > A brief feasibility report on an online psychosocial support intervention for adults with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. > print

001     310298
005     20260305150747.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1688050
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41778070
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC12951781
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2026-00521
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 150
100 1 _ |a Kiermeier, Senta
|b 0
245 _ _ |a A brief feasibility report on an online psychosocial support intervention for adults with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2026
|b Frontiers Research Foundation
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1772719652_1921029
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by a markedly elevated lifetime cancer risk. Despite the substantial psychological burden associated with LFS, tailored psychosocial interventions remain unavailable. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are evidence-based approaches widely applied in psycho-oncological care; however, no intervention has been specifically adapted for individuals with LFS. Consequently, we developed OnLiFe, an online self-management program designed to meet the unique needs of this population and investigated its acceptability and practicality in a small adult cohort.OnLiFe comprises six modules focusing on psychoeducation about emotions, mindfulness practices, and resource activation. Acceptability and practicality were assessed in terms of comprehension and satisfaction with content, usefulness, simplicity, and integrability for each module and content element. Qualitative feedback was collected through open-ended questions and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Nine female participants (mean age 46.0 ± 7.1 years) enrolled, of whom four completed all modules. Participant satisfaction with OnLiFe was rated moderate to high, while perceived helpfulness of the content showed relatively lower ratings. Qualitative data indicated that the intervention was perceived as too lengthy and that participants' busy schedules limited full engagement.Given the distinct challenges of LFS, tailored psychosocial support is required. Despite careful theoretical considerations, OnLiFe showed mixed results regarding acceptability and practicality. Addressing time constraints will be essential, and future studies are warranted to optimize and determine the efficacy of an adapted version of OnLiFe.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Li–Fraumeni syndrome
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a cancer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a cancer predisposition syndrome
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a eHealth
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a psychooncology
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Sauer, Christina
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Helaß, Madeleine
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Nees, Juliane
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Keymling, Myriam
|0 P:(DE-He78)90780180db1ef4845433057cef4eaeb0
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Silchmüller, Farina
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Dutzmann, Christina M
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Kratz, Christian P
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Schott, Sarah
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Maatouk, Imad
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1688050
|g Vol. 16, p. 1688050
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9
|p 1688050
|t Frontiers in psychology
|v 16
|y 2026
|x 1664-1078
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)90780180db1ef4845433057cef4eaeb0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2026
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FRONT PSYCHOL : 2022
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2025-05-13T11:24:59Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2025-05-13T11:24:59Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2025-05-13T11:24:59Z
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2025-05-13T11:24:59Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2025-11-07
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2025-11-07
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l E010 Radiologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21