Journal Article DKFZ-2017-04082

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Investigation of the halo-artifact in 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2017
PLoS Lawrence, Kan.

PLoS one 12(8), e0183329 - () [10.1371/journal.pone.0183329]
 GO

This record in other databases:

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA-analog (68Ga-PSMA-11) is discussed as a promising diagnostic method for patients with suspicion or history of prostate cancer. One potential drawback of this method are severe photopenic (halo-) artifacts surrounding the bladder and the kidneys in the scatter-corrected PET images, which have been reported to occur frequently in clinical practice. The goal of this work was to investigate the occurrence and impact of these artifacts and, secondly, to evaluate variants of the standard scatter correction method with regard to halo-artifact suppression.Experiments using a dedicated pelvis phantom were conducted to investigate whether the halo-artifact is modality-, tracer-, and/or concentration-dependent. Furthermore, 31 patients with history of prostate cancer were selected from an ongoing 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI study. For each patient, PET raw data were reconstructed employing six different variants of PET scatter correction: absolute scatter scaling, relative scatter scaling, and relative scatter scaling combined with prompt gamma correction, each of which was combined with a maximum scatter fraction (MaxSF) of MaxSF = 75% or MaxSF = 40%. Evaluation of the reconstructed images with regard to halo-artifact suppression was performed both quantitatively using statistical analysis and qualitatively by two independent readers.The phantom experiments did not reveal any modality-dependency (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) or tracer-dependency (68Ga vs. 18F-FDG). Patient- and phantom-based data indicated that halo-artifacts derive from high organ-to-background activity ratios (OBR) between bladder/kidneys and surrounding soft tissue, with a positive correlation between OBR and halo size. Comparing different variants of scatter correction, reducing the maximum scatter fraction from the default value MaxSF = 75% to MaxSF = 40% was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts in both phantom and patient data. In 1 of 31 patients, reducing the maximum scatter fraction provided new PET-based information changing the patient's diagnosis.Halo-artifacts are particularly observed for 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI due to 1) the biodistribution of the PSMA-11-tracer resulting in large OBRs for bladder and kidneys and 2) inaccurate scatter correction methods currently used in clinical routine, which tend to overestimate the scatter contribution. If not compensated for, 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake pathologies may be masked by halo-artifacts leading to false-negative diagnoses. Reducing the maximum scatter fraction was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Medizinische Physik in der Radiologie (E020)
  2. Medizinische Physik in der Strahlentherapie (E040)
  3. Radiopharmazeutische Chemie (E030)
  4. KKE Nuklearmedizin (E060)
  5. Radiologie (E010)
Research Program(s):
  1. 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315) (POF3-315)

Appears in the scientific report 2017
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; BIOSIS Previews ; DOAJ Seal ; Ebsco Academic Search ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection ; Zoological Record
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > E010
Institute Collections > E040
Institute Collections > E020
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2017-10-06, last modified 2024-02-28


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)