Journal Article (Editorial)

DKFZ-2019-02262

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png Three brief pieces of statistical advice for medical peer reviewers.

Heinzl, H. ; Benner, A. (Last author)DKFZ*

2019
Wiley-Blackwell56020 Oxford [u.a.]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1111/eci.13171

Abstract: The scientific peer review of medical research papers often entails the assessment of statistical results. Medical reviewers may sometimes feel overburdened by a task for which they are usually not specifically trained for. We offer three pieces of non-technical statistical advice.

Note: Commentary

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Biostatistik (C060)

Research Program(s):

1. 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313) (POF3-313)

Appears in the scientific report 2019

---

Database coverage:
; BIOSIS Previews ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; Ebsco Academic Search ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection

---