% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Heisser:147628,
author = {T. Heisser$^*$ and L. Peng$^*$ and K. Weigl$^*$ and M.
Hoffmeister$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$},
title = {{O}utcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average
risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis.},
journal = {The BMJ},
volume = {367},
issn = {0959-8138},
address = {London},
publisher = {British Medical Association56099},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-02619},
pages = {l6109},
year = {2019},
abstract = {To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of
colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening
colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by
interval between examinations and by sex.Systematic review
and meta-analysis of all available studies.PubMed, Web of
Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently
extracted characteristics and results of identified studies
and performed standardised quality ratings.Studies assessing
the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at
average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous
colonoscopy (no adenomas).28 studies were identified,
including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies,
and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between
colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10
years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies,
respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any
neoplasm were $20.7\%$ $(95\%$ confidence interval $15.8\%$
to $25.5\%),$ $23.0\%$ $(18.0\%$ to $28.0\%),$ and $21.9\%$
$(14.9\%$ to $29.0\%)$ for one to five, five to 10, and more
than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary
estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were
$2.8\%$ $(2.0\%$ to $3.7\%),$ $3.2\%$ $(2.2\%$ to $4.1\%),$
and $7.0\%$ $(5.3\%$ to $8.7\%).$ Seven studies also
reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates
stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for
men than for women.Although detection of any neoplasms was
observed in more than $20\%$ of participants within five
years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of
advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings
suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening
after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may
be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the
empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to
investigate even longer intervals.Prospero CRD42019127842.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
cin = {C070 / L101 / C120},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31722884},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6853024},
doi = {10.1136/bmj.l6109},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/147628},
}